mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: stephane eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [perfmon2] [PATCH] perf: fix the is_software_event() definition
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:53:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c86c4471001180453ueed2839n27f9e44d86ee003d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1263815616.4283.332.camel@laptop>

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 12:13 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 15:12 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>
>> > You need to also call pmu->disable() if it is a software event,
>> > because a breakpoint needs to be unregistered in hardware level
>> > too.
>>
>> breakpoint isn't a software pmu. But yeah, enable and disable need to
>> match.
>
> That is, it shouldn't be a software pmu, because we assume software
> events can always be scheduled, whereas that's definitely not so for the
> breakpoint one.
>
> Which seems to suggest the following
>
> ---
> Subject: perf: fix the is_software_event() definition
>
> When adding the breakpoint pmu Frederic forgot to exclude it from being
> a software event. While we're at it, make it an inclusive expression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> ---
>  include/linux/perf_event.h |   10 +++++++---
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> index c66b34f..835ba26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -814,9 +814,13 @@ extern int perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event, int nmi,
>  */
>  static inline int is_software_event(struct perf_event *event)
>  {
> -       return (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_RAW) &&
> -               (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE) &&
> -               (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE);
> +       switch (event->attr.type) {
> +       case PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE:
> +       case PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT:
> +       case PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE:
> +               return 1;
> +       }
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  extern atomic_t perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_MAX];
>
PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE is a hardware PMU event.


>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the
> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference
> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through
> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> perfmon2-devel mailing list
> perfmon2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfmon2-devel
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-01-18 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-12 10:50 [PATCH] perf_events: improve x86 event scheduling Stephane Eranian
2010-01-12 16:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13  9:54   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-13 16:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-13 16:52       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-13 17:22         ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-17 14:12           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-17 14:42             ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-17 16:19               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-17 21:53                 ` Stephane Eranian
2010-01-18 11:13             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:53               ` [PATCH] perf: fix the is_software_event() definition Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:07                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 12:19                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 13:46                     ` [perfmon2] " stephane eranian
2010-01-18 12:57                   ` stephane eranian
2010-01-18 13:06                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-18 12:53                 ` stephane eranian [this message]
2010-01-18 13:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c86c4471001180453ueed2839n27f9e44d86ee003d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®