From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751657AbeEUJ1U (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 05:27:20 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45532 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751177AbeEUJ1S (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2018 05:27:18 -0400 Cc: Sudeep Holla , Jeremy Linton , ACPI Devel Maling List , linux-arm Mailing List , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mark Rutland , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Xiongfeng Wang , vkilari@codeaurora.org, Al Stone , Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com, Morten.Rasmussen@arm.com, Palmer Dabbelt , Len Brown , John Garry , austinwc@codeaurora.org, tnowicki@caviumnetworks.com, jhugo@codeaurora.org, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] drivers: base: cacheinfo: setup DT cache properties early To: Andy Shevchenko References: <20180511235807.30834-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <20180511235807.30834-3-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <78b08b68-ff57-8dd8-6eb1-00548f275eac@arm.com> <20180517154701.GA20281@e107155-lin> From: Sudeep Holla Organization: ARM Message-ID: <7c9a4921-d4da-f1db-85ed-7d7f917be30c@arm.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 10:27:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 18/05/18 22:50, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:47 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > >> Is below patch does what you were looking for ? > > Somewhat. > See below for some minors. > Thanks >> of_property_read_u64 searches for a property in a device node and read >> a 64-bit value from it. Instead of using of_get_property to get the >> property and then read 64-bit value using of_read_number, we can make >> use of of_property_read_u64. > > Suggested-by? > Yes indeed, added it locally after I sent out this patch. Will send out a proper patch soon. >> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla > > >> - cache_size = of_get_property(np, propname, NULL); >> - if (cache_size) >> - this_leaf->size = of_read_number(cache_size, 1); >> + if (!of_property_read_u64(np, propname, &cache_size)) >> + this_leaf->size = cache_size; > > I suppose it's something like this > > ret = of_property_...(..., &this_leaf->VAR); > if (ret) > warning / set default / etc OK, I do prefer this but once I was told not to use structure elements directly like that, but should be harmless in this particular case, will do so. -- Regards, Sudeep