From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, will.deacon@arm.com,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com,
architt@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:10:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cc4caec-4264-db9d-3afa-e3d20d3edfa7@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7887b45-774a-2515-4304-227037b9af1f@codeaurora.org>
Hi Robin/Vivek,
On 2/1/2018 2:23 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 1/31/2018 6:39 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 19/01/18 11:43, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>>
>>> Finally add the device link between the master device and
>>> smmu, so that the smmu gets runtime enabled/disabled only when the
>>> master needs it. This is done from add_device callback which gets
>>> called once when the master is added to the smmu.
>>
>> Don't we need to balance this with a device_link_del() in .remove_device (like exynos-iommu does)?
>
> Right. Will add device_link_del() call. Thanks for pointing out.
The reason for not adding device_link_del from .remove_device was, the core device_del
which calls the .remove_device from notifier, calls device_links_purge before that.
That does the same thing as device_link_del. So by the time .remove_device is called,
device_links for that device is already cleaned up. Vivek, you may want to check once that
calling device_link_del from .remove_device has no effect, just to confirm once more.
Regards,
Sricharan
>
> regards
> Vivek
>
>>
>> Robin.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> index 95478bfb182c..33bbcfedb896 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
>>> @@ -1367,6 +1367,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>>> struct arm_smmu_device *smmu;
>>> struct arm_smmu_master_cfg *cfg;
>>> struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec;
>>> + struct device_link *link;
>>> int i, ret;
>>> if (using_legacy_binding) {
>>> @@ -1428,6 +1429,16 @@ static int arm_smmu_add_device(struct device *dev)
>>> pm_runtime_put_sync(smmu->dev);
>>> + /*
>>> + * Establish the link between smmu and master, so that the
>>> + * smmu gets runtime enabled/disabled as per the master's
>>> + * needs.
>>> + */
>>> + link = device_link_add(dev, smmu->dev, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME);
>>> + if (!link)
>>> + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "Unable to create device link between %s and %s\n",
>>> + dev_name(smmu->dev), dev_name(dev));
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> out_cfg_free:
>>>
>
--
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-02 5:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-19 11:43 [PATCH v6 0/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] base: power: runtime: Export pm_runtime_get/put_suppliers Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 12:23 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-01 6:13 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 13:06 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-01 11:33 ` Sricharan R
2018-02-01 12:31 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-01-31 13:09 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-01 8:53 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-02-02 5:40 ` Sricharan R [this message]
2018-02-02 11:31 ` Robin Murphy
2018-02-02 13:14 ` Sricharan R
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-01-29 19:42 ` Rob Herring
2018-01-31 12:00 ` Vivek Gautam
2018-01-19 11:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] drm/msm: iommu: Replace runtime calls with runtime suppliers Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cc4caec-4264-db9d-3afa-e3d20d3edfa7@codeaurora.org \
--to=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome