From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
To: Peter Schneider <pschneider1968@googlemail.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@nabladev.com,
jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org,
hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org,
sr@sladewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/533] 6.1.165-rc2 review
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2026 23:06:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7cfc1cde-a8e1-4802-831c-3e082b22fa73@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66461c13-1bb3-473c-b57f-adba9db4f756@googlemail.com>
Hi Sasha,
On 02/03/26 22:56, Peter Schneider wrote:
> Am 02.03.2026 um 17:09 schrieb Sasha Levin:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.165 release.
>> There are 533 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>
>
> I get a build error in arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:
>
> CC arch/x86/kernel/setup.o
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c: In function ‘ima_get_kexec_buffer’:
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c:385:15: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘ima_validate_range’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 385 | ret = ima_validate_range(ima_kexec_buffer_phys,
> ima_kexec_buffer_size);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:250: arch/x86/kernel/setup.o] Fehler 1
> make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:503: arch/x86/kernel] Fehler 2
> make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:503: arch/x86] Fehler 2
> make: *** [Makefile:2025: .] Fehler 2
> root@linus:/usr/src/linux-stable-rc#
>
>
> I always do my test builds with CONFIG_WEROR=Y, full .config attached.
>
> The line causing the error seems to come from
>
> 73b97ee06bd63 x86/kexec: add a sanity check on previous kernel's ima
> kexec buffer [ Upstream commit c5489d04337b47e93c0623e8145fcba3f5739efd ]
>
Interesting: I didn't get an email that this got queued to 6.1.165,
note: this is not in 6.1.165-rc1, but in 6.1.165-rc2.
I only got: FAILED: Patch "x86/kexec: add a sanity check on previous
kernel's ima kexec buffer" failed to apply to 6.1-stable tree
In any case: we need a prerequisite for this, so I will work on
backports in a few days, I think for now, we should drop this commit
from 6.1.y.
Also I see something unusual -->
6.1.165-rc1 --> 232 patches.
6.1.165-rc2 --> 533 patches.
Can you please check ?
Thanks,
Harshit
> via
>
> 136114e0abf03005e182d75761ab694648e6d388 "Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-
> stable-2026-02-12-10-48' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
> git/akpm/mm"
> Pull non-MM updates from Andrew Morton
>
>
> If I revert 73b97ee06bd635433d1c429ecdbc9167da5de588, the build
> succeeds, and the kernel boots and seems to work fine.
>
> Beste Grüße,
> Peter Schneider
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-02 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-02 16:09 Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 17:26 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-02 17:36 ` Harshit Mogalapalli [this message]
2026-03-02 17:49 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 17:58 ` Harshit Mogalapalli
2026-03-02 18:07 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 17:48 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 17:57 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-02 18:09 ` Sasha Levin
2026-03-02 18:15 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-02 19:46 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-03-02 20:12 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-02 19:35 ` Brett A C Sheffield
2026-03-02 19:55 ` Peter Schneider
2026-03-03 4:52 ` Florian Fainelli
2026-03-03 7:34 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-03-03 12:26 ` Ron Economos
2026-03-03 19:37 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-03 21:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-03-04 6:14 ` Hardik Garg
2026-03-04 17:47 ` Shuah Khan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7cfc1cde-a8e1-4802-831c-3e082b22fa73@oracle.com \
--to=harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com \
--cc=achill@achill.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hargar@microsoft.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=patches@kernelci.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pavel@nabladev.com \
--cc=pschneider1968@googlemail.com \
--cc=rwarsow@gmx.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=sr@sladewatkins.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®