From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>,
David Windsor <dave@nullcore.net>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: Clear out elevator private data
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 15:45:38 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d192394-568c-53e0-4359-723769c3ed7d@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180417214218.GA44753@beast>
On 4/17/18 3:42 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Some elevators may not correctly check rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELVPRIV, and
> may attempt to read rq->elv fields. When requests got reused, this
> caused BFQ to think it already had a bfqq (rq->elv.priv[1]) allocated.
> This could lead to odd behaviors like having the sense buffer address
> slowly start incrementing. This eventually tripped HARDENED_USERCOPY
> and KASAN.
>
> This patch wipes all of rq->elv instead of just rq->elv.icq. While
> it shouldn't technically be needed, this ends up being a robustness
> improvement that should lead to at least finding bugs in elevators faster.
Comments from the other email still apply, we should not need to do this
full memset() for every request. From a quick look, BFQ needs to straighten
out its usage of prepare request and interactions with insert_request.
> Reported-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
> Fixes: bd166ef183c26 ("blk-mq-sched: add framework for MQ capable IO schedulers")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
> In theory, BFQ needs to also check the RQF_ELVPRIV flag, but I'll leave that
> to Paolo to figure out. Also, my Fixes line is kind of a best-guess. This
> is where icq was originally wiped, so it seemed as good a commit as any.
Yeah, that's probably a bit too broad for fixes :-)
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-17 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-17 21:42 Kees Cook
2018-04-17 21:45 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2018-04-17 22:57 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-17 23:00 ` Jens Axboe
2018-04-18 8:47 ` Paolo Valente
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d192394-568c-53e0-4359-723769c3ed7d@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bart.vanassche@wdc.com \
--cc=dave@nullcore.net \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
--cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®