Hi Benjamin,

On Wed, 2021-05-05 at 15:28 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> > 
> > > When user modifies a custom feature value and
> > > sensor_hub_set_feature()
> > > fails, return error.
> > > 
> > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> > > srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Replaces patch: HID: hid-sensor-custom: remove useless variable
> > > by Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> > > 
> > >  drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-
> > > sensor-custom.c
> > > index 2628bc53ed80..58b54b127cdf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
> > > @@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device
> > > *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> > >                                                              
> > > report_id;
> > >               ret = sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev,
> > > report_id,
> > >                                            index, sizeof(value),
> > > &value);
> > > +             if (ret)
> > > +                     return ret;
> > 
> > What tree is this patch against? In my tree, we're not even
> > assigning
> > sensor_hub_set_feature() return value to anything.
> > 
> 
> I guess there was a "collision". At roughly the same time I merged
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=456269
> people were starting to send various patches for the same thing.
> 
> Srinivas, either the change in for-next (and probably Linus' master
> now) is fine, or could you rebase on top of hid.git?
> 

Rebased and attached based on top of the latest mainline.

Thanks,
Srinivas


> Cheers,
> Benjamin
>