From: haoxiang_li2024 <haoxiang_li2024@163.com>
To: "Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: marcel@holtmann.org, luiz.dentz@gmail.com,
yangyingliang@huawei.com, mst@redhat.com, error27@gmail.com,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: virtio_bt: unregister HCI device on open failure
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:09:10 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d587d87.1fca.19efc89d056.Coremail.haoxiang_li2024@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17c94df1-3659-4d21-b327-ad52d498ba9c@molgen.mpg.de>
Hi Paul,
At 2026-06-24 17:10:55, "Paul Menzel" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
>Should you resend, please re-flow for 72/75 characters, so only three
>lines are used.
>
Thank you for the review!
Following Dan's suggestions, I reworked the patch in v2. I also made the
commit message more compact based on your suggestion.
>
>PS: gemini/gemini-3.1-pro-preview found an unrelated issue to the patch
>during review of this patch [1].
>
>> This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path safely clean up the
>> active virtqueues?
>> Earlier in virtbt_probe(), virtio_device_ready(vdev) marks the device as
>> active. If virtbt_open_vdev() subsequently fails, the code jumps to the
>> open_failed label and eventually reaches here to call del_vqs(vdev).
>> Deleting virtqueues without calling virtio_reset_device(vdev) first violates
>> the VirtIO API contract for active devices. It could allow the host or
>> hypervisor to access guest memory that has already been freed by del_vqs(),
>> potentially leading to a use-after-free.
>> Should virtio_reset_device(vdev) be called before tearing down the
>> virtqueues in this error path?
>
>No idea, how to best track these things.
>
The issue noted in your PS is now handled by resetting the virtio device
before tearing down the virtqueues in the virtbt_open_vdev() failure path.
Since v2 changes more than the original one-line fix, I did not carry your
Reviewed-by tag. Thanks again!
Thanks,
Haoxiang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 8:43 Haoxiang Li
2026-06-24 9:10 ` Paul Menzel
2026-06-25 2:09 ` haoxiang_li2024 [this message]
2026-06-24 10:56 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d587d87.1fca.19efc89d056.Coremail.haoxiang_li2024@163.com \
--to=haoxiang_li2024@163.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®