From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Deepak Singh Rawat <drawat@vmware.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: revert dma direct internals abuse
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:47:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d5f35da4a6b58639519f0764c7edbfe4dd1ba02.camel@vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190408105525.5493-1-hch@lst.de>
Christoph,
On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 12:55 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> unfortunately it took less than a merge window for the:
>
> /*
> * All the dma_direct_* declarations are here just for the indirect
> call bypass,
> * and must not be used directly drivers!
> */
>
> warning in dma-mapping.h to be ignored. This series reverts the
> offender
> to keep our API clean.
>
> Thomas: please talk me first about your needs and I'll be happy to
> figure out
> a proper API for what you want to do.
We HAVE discussed our needs, although admittedly some of my emails
ended up unanswered.
We've as you're well aware of had a discussion with the other
subsystems doing user-space DMA-buffers wanting this functionality from
the dma api (AMD graphics and RDMA people IIRC). that is a bool that
tells us whether streaming dma mappings are coherent, and I described
in detail why we couldn't use the dma_sync_* API and
dma_alloc_coherent().
The other option we have is to just fail miserably without messages if
streaming DMA is not coherent, which I think the other drivers might
do... That's all I'm trying to avoid here. I'd much prefer to have the
dma API export this bool.
/Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-08 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-08 10:55 Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08 10:55 ` [PATCH] Revert "drm/vmwgfx: Improve on IOMMU detection" Christoph Hellwig
2019-04-08 20:05 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-04-08 18:47 ` Thomas Hellstrom [this message]
2019-04-09 9:57 ` revert dma direct internals abuse hch
2019-04-09 13:04 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-04-09 13:31 ` hch
2019-04-09 14:17 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-04-09 15:25 ` hch
2019-04-09 17:24 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-04-10 6:43 ` hch
2019-04-10 15:01 ` Thomas Hellstrom
2019-04-22 17:56 ` hch
2019-04-23 12:26 ` Thomas Hellstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7d5f35da4a6b58639519f0764c7edbfe4dd1ba02.camel@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=drawat@vmware.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®