mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
	"Avri.Altman@wdc.com" <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
Cc: "beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Allow platform vendors to set rtt
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 06:56:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7d719385-beee-4780-ac6b-8c5cace90b1e@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a57d6bab739d6a10584f2baba115d00dfc9c94c.camel@mediatek.com>

On 5/23/24 23:06, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-
> mediatek.c
> index c4f997196c57..f8725f3374f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c
> @@ -1777,6 +1777,32 @@ static int ufs_mtk_config_esi(struct ufs_hba
> *hba)
>          return ufs_mtk_config_mcq(hba, true);
>   }
>   
> +static void ufs_mtk_set_rtt(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +       struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info = &hba->dev_info;
> +       u32 rtt = 0;
> +       u32 dev_rtt = 0;
> +
> +       /* RTT override makes sense only for UFS-4.0 and above */
> +       if (dev_info->wspecversion < 0x400)
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_READ_ATTR,
> +                                   QUERY_ATTR_IDN_MAX_NUM_OF_RTT, 0,
> 0, &dev_rtt)) {
> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "failed reading bMaxNumOfRTT\n");
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* override if not mediatek support */
> +       if (dev_rtt == MTK_MAX_NUM_RTT)
> +               return;
> +
> +       rtt = MTK_MAX_NUM_RTT;
> +       if (ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR,
> +                                   QUERY_ATTR_IDN_MAX_NUM_OF_RTT, 0,
> 0, &rtt))
> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "failed writing bMaxNumOfRTT\n");
> +}
> +
>   /*
>    * struct ufs_hba_mtk_vops - UFS MTK specific variant operations
>    *
> @@ -1805,6 +1831,7 @@ static const struct ufs_hba_variant_ops
> ufs_hba_mtk_vops = {
>          .op_runtime_config   = ufs_mtk_op_runtime_config,
>          .mcq_config_resource = ufs_mtk_mcq_config_resource,
>          .config_esi          = ufs_mtk_config_esi,
> +       .set_rtt             = ufs_mtk_set_rtt,
>   };
>   
>   /**
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-
> mediatek.h
> index 3ff17e95afab..05d76a6bd772 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.h
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.h
> @@ -189,4 +189,7 @@ struct ufs_mtk_host {
>   /* MTK delay of autosuspend: 500 ms */
>   #define MTK_RPM_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY_MS 500
>   
> +/* MTK RTT support number */
> +#define MTK_MAX_NUM_RTT 2
> +
>   #endif /* !_UFS_MEDIATEK_H */

The above patch would result in duplication of code. We should avoid
code duplication if that's reasonably possible. Instead of applying the
above patch, I propose to add a callback function pointer in struct
ufs_hba_variant_ops that returns the maximum RTT value supported by the
host driver.

Thanks,

Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-24 13:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-23 12:58 [PATCH v5 0/3] scsi: ufs: Allow RTT negotiation Avri Altman
2024-05-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] " Avri Altman
2024-05-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Allow platform vendors to set rtt Avri Altman
2024-05-23 13:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-23 13:09     ` Avri Altman
2024-05-23 13:11       ` hch
2024-05-24  6:06         ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-05-24 13:56           ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-05-25 14:55             ` Avri Altman
2024-05-23 12:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] scsi: ufs: sysfs: Make max_number_of_rtt read-write Avri Altman
2024-05-23 23:05   ` Bart Van Assche
2024-05-24  3:54     ` Avri Altman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7d719385-beee-4780-ac6b-8c5cace90b1e@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=Avri.Altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®