Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] change UIC command handling

[Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>]

On 11/09/23 04:35, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
>>> v2 -> v3: rule out the change of polling w/ pmc from this thread.
>>> (I'll post the change later)
>>> v1 -> v2: remove an unused variable in __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd
>>>
>>> Kiwoong Kim (2):
>>>   ufs: make __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd not wrapped by host_lock
>>>   ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command
>>
>> Applied to 6.6/scsi-staging, thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering
> 
> Hi, Martin
> 
> The following patch seems to make trouble because of using
> read_poll_timeout.
> Its initial version used udelay and after discussion it's been changed.
> Could you revert this patch set?
> 
>> ufs: poll HCS.UCRDY before issuing a UIC command
> 
> [ 4671.226480] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140] BUG: scheduling while atomic:
> kworker/u20:29/17140/0x00000002
> ..
> [ 4671.228723] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  panic+0x16c/0x388
> [ 4671.228745] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  check_panic_on_warn+0x60/0x94
> [ 4671.228764] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  __schedule_bug+0x6c/0x94
> [ 4671.228786] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  __schedule+0x6f4/0xa64
> [ 4671.228806] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  schedule+0x7c/0xe8
> [ 4671.228824] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x98/0x114
> [ 4671.228841] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x14/0x24
> [ 4671.228856] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  usleep_range_state+0x60/0x94
> [ 4671.228871] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  __ufshcd_send_uic_cmd+0xa0/0x1c4
> [ 4671.228893] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  ufshcd_uic_pwr_ctrl+0x15c/0x390
> [ 4671.228908] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> ufshcd_uic_hibern8_enter+0x9c/0x25c
> [ 4671.228922] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]
> ufshcd_link_state_transition+0x34/0xb0
> [ 4671.228939] [3: kworker/u20:29:17140]  __ufshcd_wl_suspend+0x3f0/0x4b4

Do you know what is in that path that makes it an atomic context?