From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Xu Xin <xu.xin@linux.dev>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Stefan Roesch <shr@devkernel.io>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: align smart scan skips with the scan number
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 20:51:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7df793d7-55dd-40db-8455-1f22bb44193c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107-bug-mm-ksm-smart-scan-align-skips-v3-1-16d5ce8b5fd6@gmail.com>
On 11/7/26 17:57, Qiliang Yuan wrote:
> Smart scan skips pages that KSM has failed to de-duplicate for a while.
> Once a page is three scans old, its rmap_item counts down its own number
> of scans to skip, 1, 2, 4 and then 8 as it ages, so an old page is looked
> at every ninth scan.
>
> The unstable tree is rebuilt on every scan, so two identical pages that
> are not in the stable tree yet can only be merged in a scan that looks
> at both. Each countdown runs from when its own page became mergeable, so
> two pages that became mergeable at different times end up on different
> phases and, once both are old, may never be looked at in the same scan
> again. They then stay unmerged for as long as they live. The pairs below
> are counted by making a page mergeable, waiting for 0 to 20 full scans
> before doing the same with an identical page, 20 times for each wait,
> and checking the pair after another 64 full scans, on two boots per
> kernel.
>
> Pick the skipped scans by the global scan number instead, with periods
> of 2, 4 and 8 scans. The periods being powers of two, every old page is
> looked at on each scan that is a multiple of 8, whatever its age, so any
> two pages meet at least every eighth scan. The longest period goes from
> nine scans to eight, so ksmd looks at more of the pages that never
> merge. The rest of the table is measured on 64M of such pages, median of
> five runs of 256 scans on each of three boots per kernel, CPU time from
> schedstat:
>
> before after after/before
> pairs merged (of 420) 361 420 116%
> 334 420 126%
> pages looked at per scan 1792 2048 114%
>
Oh, I was wondering whether this should actually go to stable? Do you think the
above is rather an extreme case, and most users won't really run into it that
severely?
--
Cheers,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 16:56 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/ksm: keep smart scan from losing duplicate pages Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-07 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/ksm: align smart scan skips with the scan number Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-07 19:49 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-07 19:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
2026-11-07 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] docs/mm: ksm: describe how smart scan picks the scans to skip Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-07 19:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-07 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] selftests/mm: move waiting for KSM full scans into a helper Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-07 19:48 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-07 16:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] selftests/mm: cover merging KSM pages aged by smart scan Qiliang Yuan
2026-11-07 19:53 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-07 19:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/ksm: keep smart scan from losing duplicate pages David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7df793d7-55dd-40db-8455-1f22bb44193c@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shr@devkernel.io \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®