From: Vijay Balakrishna <vijayb@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [arm64] kernel boot slowdown in v5.10.19 -> v5.10.42 update
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 10:03:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e43a7e9-f299-1d6d-8b61-425793abcc3e@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfPcNy3JcnwuJNMx@arm.com>
On 1/28/2022 4:06 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 03:03:48PM -0800, Vijay Balakrishna wrote:
>> We noticed 150ms kernel boot slowdown back in June, 2021, when moving from
>> v5.10.19 to v5.10.42. This on a 8GB SoC. Only recently we investigated
>> this issue and found the regression is introduced by a change in map_mem()
>> (paging_init() -> map_mem() -> __map_memblock(), in particular "map all the
>> memory banks" for loop) by patch
>>
>> 2687275a5843d1089687f08fc64eb3f3b026a169
>> arm64: Force NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS if crashkernel reservation is required
>>
>> above is a follow up to
>>
>> 0a30c53573b07d5561457e41fb0ab046cd857da5
>> arm64: mm: Move reserve_crashkernel() into mem_init())
>>
>> which deferred crashkernel reservation into mem_init().
>>
>> The ~150ms slowdown disappears on booting without "crashkernel=.." on kernel
>> command-line.
>
> Is CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED set in your config file? It may
> cause the same slowdown. I suspect it's because we end up mapping the
> RAM at the page granularity so more loops and slightly higher TLB
> pressure. Not sure we can do much about >
Catalin,
Thanks for your reply.
CONFIG_RODATA_FULL_DEFAULT_ENABLED is not set in our config for boot
time performance reasons.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-24 23:03 Vijay Balakrishna
2022-01-28 12:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-01-28 18:03 ` Vijay Balakrishna [this message]
2022-02-09 21:47 ` Vijay Balakrishna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e43a7e9-f299-1d6d-8b61-425793abcc3e@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=vijayb@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®