From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D9211A9B46 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738873477; cv=none; b=bBlaqFf68rp7NCThA80z3fcfhqlzPZZRfEKygrCbX8kPBmL9oVjTI1aWosgxq/mE0W+aMgcCfWaWLW00NzQhhyPrUyhz+gJu+1uouPggJJQPxwPliv3pJGo0U7NTcBtzgs3eHXV04RBaBLMdR4VsdqVO3WsFW2GKdoimzNaeUV0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738873477; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Ju/TUhVKE/cZ/J9yTpBKpw0jfk9S75VKJCf/VUiMoSI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=Zelvu6GQOFpgVR69kiHD/+7lT2U3OMiQnVfljxPQ4W4hCLt0TgTKJTuumMtRx9evO/yzOtQpPNmy4CijWPMXNOunAxqUM+fzjrirXOewyzM+MneCJDAROFo/KarDh2M/B6a6z/werDxJGu8jMvW4erkZKoUSDjfScbpGaTwz6Bo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=PEri0RDL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="PEri0RDL" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YppVV4L75zlgTwF; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :from:from:content-language:references:subject:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:date:message-id:received:received; s=mr01; t=1738873470; x=1741465471; bh=Ju/TUhVKE/cZ/J9yTpBKpw0j fk9S75VKJCf/VUiMoSI=; b=PEri0RDLInev5yWByTM3RJ9U/N2QYfBcde3kXqHh NvPhazYh92A54JmUMvWpbMUen6wCFZ/jbq8W64yh+xLOxB8nR9Jxv7N5lMONF1ZV wdPDv73dXSnWSIpFEhdJPnZkbNcjS9xPBuzjWHih5f9CWFZ48/jIzWk2B/r9usyv FvZZ/WXNcJ7zc9r+r1KPzByg2msjGNvSNlTSMjhd5JJaCsIJeMRF3pff7qsYZbtH MIMzXDRFqKlCHYIhJlnZQuH8hEKKP/RSf0ZqSReFfWrDFa5OvhwD8EOyXuAhaecc EvH8WxxZZA7fs368PYMKBoJJXO0s2NUfs1PY51j1I6/bxg== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id gnQPWVpISK2x; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [100.66.154.22] (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4YppVM67tZzlgTw4; Thu, 6 Feb 2025 20:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <7e52f219-6a23-4e55-a719-0519267dd1e6@acm.org> Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 12:24:26 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 24/33] drm: zynqmp_dp: Fix a deadlock in zynqmp_dp_ignore_hpd_set() To: Sean Anderson , Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Will Deacon , Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Marco Elver , Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , Kees Cook , Jann Horn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra References: <20250206175114.1974171-1-bvanassche@acm.org> <20250206175114.1974171-25-bvanassche@acm.org> <25e047ee-cc48-42a0-9ee2-88753114f4a4@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Bart Van Assche In-Reply-To: <25e047ee-cc48-42a0-9ee2-88753114f4a4@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/6/25 11:22 AM, Sean Anderson wrote: > Since this patch is marked RFC will it be applied soon? I am about to > send a patch which conflicts with this one. I would like to just add > this patch to my series. Hi Sean, Thanks for having taken a look. Please include this patch in your patch series if you want it to be merged in the upstream kernel soon. Bart.