From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Save prq descriptors in an internal list
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:25:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7e95de33-95e9-0647-9611-aa4ec72171c9@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <399dd037-b32e-30a7-013c-b68e9a3bbc7a@linux.intel.com>
Hi Kevin,
On 2020/4/16 9:46, Lu Baolu wrote:
> On 2020/4/15 17:30, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> From: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 1:26 PM
>>>
>>> Currently, the page request interrupt thread handles the page
>>> requests in the queue in this way:
>>>
>>> - Clear PPR bit to ensure new interrupt could come in;
>>> - Read and record the head and tail registers;
>>> - Handle all descriptors between head and tail;
>>> - Write tail to head register.
>>>
>>> This might cause some descriptors to be handles multiple times.
>>> An example sequence:
>>>
>>> - Thread A got scheduled with PRQ_1 and PRQ_2 in the queue;
>>> - Thread A clear the PPR bit and record the head and tail;
>>> - A new PRQ_3 comes and Thread B gets scheduled;
>>> - Thread B record the head and tail which includes PRQ_1
>>> and PRQ_2.
>> I may overlook something but isn't the prq interrupt thread
>> per iommu then why would two prq threads contend here?
>
> The prq interrupt could be masked by the PPR (Pending Page Request) bit
> in Page Request Status Register. In the interrupt handling thread once
> this bit is clear, new prq interrupts are allowed to be generated.
>
> So, if a page request is in process and the PPR bit is cleared, another
> page request from any devices under the same iommu could trigger another
> interrupt thread.
Rechecked the code. You are right. As long as the interrupt thread is
per iommu, there will only single prq thread scheduled. I will change
this accordingly in the new version. Thank you for pointing this out.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-15 5:25 [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor parameters for qi_submit_sync() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:02 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 8:33 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iommu/vt-d: Multiple descriptors per qi_submit_sync() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:18 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 8:30 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 8:51 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Add support to show inv queue internals Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iommu/vt-d: Refactor prq_event_thread() Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 9:15 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 1:33 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Save prq descriptors in an internal list Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 9:30 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 1:46 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-17 3:25 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 11:10 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-16 2:19 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-16 8:38 ` Lu Baolu
2020-04-17 2:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 5:25 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove redundant IOTLB flush Lu Baolu
2020-04-15 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] iommu/vt-d: Add page request draining support Tian, Kevin
2020-04-15 8:25 ` Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7e95de33-95e9-0647-9611-aa4ec72171c9@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome