From: Hao Ge <hao.ge@linux.dev>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] alloc_tag: expose profiling and compression states
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 09:40:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7eaf894f-5824-47e8-bcb5-94c0aad52e8b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpGA7F80yW1=bSXsZre4=Tx=peqNbkWvKF0up8xJdSvrgA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026/8/4 08:30, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2026 at 2:54 PM Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com> wrote:
>> Currently, userspace has limited visibility into the exact active
>> runtime state of memory allocation profiling and its page extension
>> compression ('sysctl.vm.mem_profiling={0|1|never}[,compressed]').
>>
>> While reading the sysctl provides basic on/off status, it is currently
>> impossible for userspace to natively determine whether page-tag
>> compression was successfully enabled without scraping dmesg boot logs.
>>
>> Resolve this ambiguity by exposing the active compression state by
>> adding a new read-only sysctl `vm.mem_profiling_compressed` to output the
> "Resolve this ambiguity by exposing the active compression state by
> adding a new read-only sysctl" sounds too elaborate. This also
> conflicts with the documentation you added which states
> "`mem_profiling_compressed` represents the state configured at boot
> time", so your description of it representing "the active compression
> state" is incorrect.
> How about: "Add a new read-only sysctl representing how compression
> was configured at boot time."?
>
>> state.
>>
>> v3 change:
>> - Added documentation about the behaviour details of the new sysctl.
>>
>> v2 change:
>> - Moved from displaying the state in /proc/allocinfo to a new read-only
>> sysctl.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Bapat <abhishekbapat@google.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst | 13 +++++++++++++
>> mm/alloc_tag.c | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst b/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
>> index c3a28467955f..3ad1e9aacb9a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/mm/allocation-profiling.rst
>> @@ -43,6 +43,19 @@ sysctl:
>> warnings produced by allocations made while profiling is disabled and freed
>> when it's enabled.
>>
>> + /proc/sys/vm/mem_profiling_compressed
>> +
>> + 1: Page extension compression is enabled.
> We are not compressing page extensions but rather page allocation
> tags, so "Page extension compression" is misleading. I think "Page
> allocation tag compression is enabled." would be better.
Agree. The commit message describes it the same way ("page extension
compression"),
so that needs fixing too.
Thanks
Best Regards
Hao
>
>> +
>> + 0: Page extension compression is disabled.
>> +
>> + This control is read-only and reflects the compression status initialized at boot.
>> + Note that, unlike `mem_profiling`, which represents the current state of profiling,
>> + `mem_profiling_compressed` represents the state configured at boot time. Turning off
>> + profiling at runtime will implicitly make this sysctl effectively dormant. However, if
>> + profiling is toggled off and then toggled on again, it will resume with compression
>> + still enabled as long as the value of `mem_profiling_compressed` is 1.
>> +
>> Runtime info:
>> /proc/allocinfo
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/alloc_tag.c b/mm/alloc_tag.c
>> index 52aece27b00e..877068241f06 100644
>> --- a/mm/alloc_tag.c
>> +++ b/mm/alloc_tag.c
>> @@ -1303,6 +1303,12 @@ static const struct ctl_table memory_allocation_profiling_sysctls[] = {
>> .mode = 0644,
>> .proc_handler = proc_mem_profiling_handler,
>> },
>> + {
>> + .procname = "mem_profiling_compressed",
>> + .data = &mem_profiling_compressed,
>> + .mode = 0444,
>> + .proc_handler = proc_do_static_key,
>> + },
>> };
>>
>> static void __init sysctl_init(void)
>>
>> base-commit: 94f9b3980dd446b56acf1dfed649e9b32a9f3813
>> --
>> 2.55.0.508.g3f0d502094-goog
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 21:54 Abhishek Bapat
2026-08-04 0:30 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2026-08-04 1:40 ` Hao Ge [this message]
2026-08-04 2:15 ` Hao Ge
2026-08-04 3:17 ` Hao Ge
2026-08-04 17:28 ` Abhishek Bapat
2026-08-04 19:59 ` Abhishek Bapat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7eaf894f-5824-47e8-bcb5-94c0aad52e8b@linux.dev \
--to=hao.ge@linux.dev \
--cc=abhishekbapat@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®