From: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Security Officers <security@kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] media: vivid: Fix wrong locking that causes race conditions on streaming stop
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 00:44:12 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ec33848-67a6-069a-132c-f8550f6e090f@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgE-veRb7+mw9oMmsD97BLnL+q8Gxu0QRrK65S2yQfMdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 03.11.2019 19:45, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2019 at 12:03 PM Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com> wrote:
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&dev->mutex);
>> + if (!mutex_trylock(&dev->mutex)) {
>> + schedule_timeout(1);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>
> I just realized that this too is wrong. It _works_, but because it
> doesn't actually set the task state to anything particular before
> scheduling, it's basically pointless. It calls the scheduler, but it
> won't delay anything, because the task stays runnable.
Linus, thanks for noticing that.
I've double-checked: I didn't manage to get a deadlock with schedule_timeout(1)
on the kernel with CONFIG_FREEZER disabled and CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y.
But setting a bigger timeout argument (e.g. 1000) doesn't change the behavior,
which agrees with your statement.
> So what you presumably want to use is either "cond_resched()" (to make
> sure others get to run with no delay) or
> "schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1)" which actually sets the process
> state to TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE.
I changed it to schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1).
I'll send the v4 shortly as a reply to this thread, because I refer to it in the
oss-security mailing list.
> The above works, but it's basically nonsensical. My bad for not
> noticing earlier.
Thank you, now I know.
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-03 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-02 19:03 Alexander Popov
2019-11-02 20:50 ` Alexander Popov
2019-11-03 16:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-03 21:44 ` Alexander Popov [this message]
2019-11-03 22:17 ` [PATCH v4 " Alexander Popov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ec33848-67a6-069a-132c-f8550f6e090f@linux.com \
--to=alex.popov@linux.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®