mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
To: gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn,bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,andrii@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,a.s.protopopov@gmail.com,shuah@kernel.org,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn,ast@kernel.org,andrii@kernel.org,daniel@iogearbox.net,martin.lau@kernel.org,eddyz87@gmail.com,yonghong.song@linux.dev,clm@meta.com,ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: Fix gotox target validation against CFG
Date: Tue,  9 Jun 2026 15:42:57 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ec49cbf243822be83aa8d47da10b3d8a739952e544fcd86aeab6b1ccd447d90@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609-f01-02-gotox-bpf-next-v1-1-b441d63a1559@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2339 bytes --]

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index ed7ba0e6a9ce..25fa90e731e3 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -17124,6 +17124,23 @@ static int indirect_jump_min_max_index(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static bool is_cfg_indirect_jump_target(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> +					u32 target)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_iarray *jt = env->insn_aux_data[env->insn_idx].jt;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!jt)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < jt->cnt; i++) {
> +		if (jt->items[i] == target)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  /* gotox *dst_reg */
>  static int check_indirect_jump(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
>  {

[ ... ]

> @@ -17171,6 +17188,15 @@ static int check_indirect_jump(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *in
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>
> +	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +		if (!is_cfg_indirect_jump_target(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i])) {
> +			verbose(env,
> +				"gotox target %u from map id=%d is not in the CFG jump table\n",
> +				env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i], map->id);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +	}
> +

Could this nested loop create an O(N * M) algorithmic complexity that
bypasses verifier complexity limits?

The outer loop iterates n times, and is_cfg_indirect_jump_target()
performs a linear scan over jt->cnt items. Both n and jt->cnt are bounded
by the map's max_entries, which can be very large.

Since there is no cond_resched() here, this creates a synchronous
iteration sequence that could trigger the kernel watchdog panic or lead to
CPU soft lockup.

Given that both gotox_tmp_buf->items and jt->items are strictly sorted
arrays, could this be optimized to O(N + M) using a two-pointer merge
approach or O(N log M) using binary search?

Raised by sashiko-bot@kernel.org in v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260609151359.3C6F51F00893@smtp.kernel.org/

>  	for (i = 0; i < n - 1; i++) {
>  		mark_indirect_target(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i]);
>  		other_branch = push_stack(env, env->gotox_tmp_buf->items[i],

[ ... ]


---
AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md

CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/27216356316

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-09 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-09 15:03 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] " Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-09 15:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-09 15:42   ` bot+bpf-ci [this message]
2026-06-09 15:56   ` Anton Protopopov
2026-06-09 17:27     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-10 12:22     ` Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-09 15:03 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add cross-subprog gotox target coverage Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-09 15:42   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-09 16:14   ` Anton Protopopov
2026-06-13  9:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Enforce gotox targets against subprog bounds Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-13  9:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] " Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-21 15:20     ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-22 15:08     ` Anton Protopopov
2026-06-22 18:06     ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-06-13  9:33   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add cross-subprog gotox target coverage Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-13 10:08     ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-06-21 15:21     ` Yonghong Song
2026-06-22 14:40     ` Anton Protopopov
2026-06-23  9:11       ` Nuoqi Gui
2026-06-22 15:17   ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] bpf: Enforce gotox targets against subprog bounds Anton Protopopov
2026-06-23  8:56     ` Nuoqi Gui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ec49cbf243822be83aa8d47da10b3d8a739952e544fcd86aeab6b1ccd447d90@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.s.protopopov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnq25@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox