From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 19:03:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ed20fcf-8a9d-40d5-b913-b5d2da443cd6@sifive.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6kpdj20.fsf@mail.lhotse>
On 2023-12-11 6:23 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Thanks for trying to clean all this up.
>
> One problem below.
>
> Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com> writes:
>> Now that all previously-supported architectures select
>> ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT, this code can depend on that symbol instead
>> of the existing list of architectures. It can also take advantage of the
>> common kernel-mode FPU API and method of adjusting CFLAGS.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
> ...
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
>> index 4ae4720535a5..b64f917174ca 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
>> @@ -87,20 +78,9 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
>> preempt_disable();
>> depth = __this_cpu_inc_return(fpu_recursion_depth);
>> -
>> if (depth == 1) {
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
>> + BUG_ON(!kernel_fpu_available());
>> kernel_fpu_begin();
>> -#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
>> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
>> - enable_kernel_vsx();
>> - else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
>> - enable_kernel_altivec();
>
> Note altivec.
>
>> - else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
>> - enable_kernel_fp();
>> -#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
>> - kernel_neon_begin();
>> -#endif
>> }
>>
>> TRACE_DCN_FPU(true, function_name, line, depth);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
>> index ea7d60f9a9b4..5aad0f572ba3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
>> @@ -25,40 +25,8 @@
>> # It provides the general basic services required by other DAL
>> # subcomponents.
>>
>> -ifdef CONFIG_X86
>> -dml_ccflags-$(CONFIG_CC_IS_GCC) := -mhard-float
>> -dml_ccflags := $(dml_ccflags-y) -msse
>> -endif
>> -
>> -ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>> -dml_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
>> -endif
>
> And altivec is enabled in the flags there.
>
> That doesn't match your implementation for powerpc in patch 7, which
> only deals with float.
>
> I suspect the AMD driver actually doesn't need altivec enabled, but I
> don't know that for sure. It compiles without it, but I don't have a GPU
> to actually test. I've added Timothy on Cc who added the support for
> powerpc to the driver originally, hopefully he has a test system.
I tested this series on a POWER9 system with an AMD Radeon RX 6400 GPU (which
requires this FPU code to initialize), and got functioning graphics output.
> Anyway if that's true that it doesn't need altivec we should probably do
> a lead-up patch that drops altivec from the AMD driver explicitly, eg.
> as below.
That makes sense to me. Do you want to provide your Signed-off-by so I can send
this patch with your authorship?
Regards,
Samuel
> cheers
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> index 4ae4720535a5..0de16796466b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/dc_fpu.c
> @@ -92,11 +92,7 @@ void dc_fpu_begin(const char *function_name, const int line)
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> kernel_fpu_begin();
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
> - enable_kernel_vsx();
> - else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
> - enable_kernel_altivec();
> - else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
> + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
> enable_kernel_fp();
> #elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> kernel_neon_begin();
> @@ -125,11 +121,7 @@ void dc_fpu_end(const char *function_name, const int line)
> #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_LOONGARCH)
> kernel_fpu_end();
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PPC64)
> - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_VSX_COMP))
> - disable_kernel_vsx();
> - else if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_ALTIVEC_COMP))
> - disable_kernel_altivec();
> - else if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
> + if (!cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_FPU_UNAVAILABLE))
> disable_kernel_fp();
> #elif defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> kernel_neon_end();
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> index 6042a5a6a44f..554c39024a40 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/Makefile
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ dml_ccflags := $(dml_ccflags-y) -msse
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -dml_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
> +dml_ccflags := -mhard-float
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
> index acff3449b8d7..7b51364084b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/Makefile
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ dml2_ccflags := $(dml2_ccflags-y) -msse
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
> -dml2_ccflags := -mhard-float -maltivec
> +dml2_ccflags := -mhard-float
> endif
>
> ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-14 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-08 5:54 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Unified cross-architecture kernel-mode FPU API Samuel Holland
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] arch: Add ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] ARM: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] ARM: crypto: Use CC_FLAGS_FPU for NEON CFLAGS Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] arm64: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:19 ` Will Deacon
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] lib/raid6: Use CC_FLAGS_FPU for NEON CFLAGS Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-11 16:12 ` Samuel Holland
2023-12-12 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] LoongArch: Implement ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-13 16:13 ` WANG Xuerui
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] powerpc: " Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] x86: " Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] riscv: Add support for kernel-mode FPU Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-11 16:16 ` Samuel Holland
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] drm/amd/display: Use ARCH_HAS_KERNEL_FPU_SUPPORT Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 12:23 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-14 1:03 ` Samuel Holland [this message]
2023-12-14 3:13 ` Timothy Pearson
2023-12-14 4:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] selftests/fpu: Move FP code to a separate translation unit Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] selftests/fpu: Allow building on other architectures Samuel Holland
2023-12-11 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ed20fcf-8a9d-40d5-b913-b5d2da443cd6@sifive.com \
--to=samuel.holland@sifive.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=tpearson@raptorengineering.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®