Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: userspace: make scaling_setspeed return the actual requested frequency

["lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>]

On 1/19/2026 4:28 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 16-01-26, 17:46, Pengjie Zhang wrote:
>> According to the Linux kernel ABI documentation for 'scaling_setspeed':
>>    "It returns the last frequency requested by the governor (in kHz) or
>>     can be written to in order to set a new frequency for the policy."
>>
>> However, the current implementation of show_speed() returns 'policy->cur'.
>> 'policy->cur' represents the frequency after the driver has
>> resolved the request against the hardware frequency table and applied
>> policy limits (min/max).
>>
>> This creates a discrepancy between the documentation/user expectation and
>> the actual code behavior. For instance:
>>
>> 1. User writes a value to 'scaling_setspeed' that is not in the OPP table
>>     (e.g., user asks for A, driver rounds it to B).
>> 2. User reads 'scaling_setspeed'.
>> 3. Code returns B ('policy->cur').
>> 4. User expects A (the "frequency requested"), but gets B.
>>
>> This patch changes show_speed() to return 'userspace->setspeed', which
>> stores the actual value last requested by the user. This restores the
>> read/write symmetry of the attribute and aligns the code with the ABI
>> description.
>>
>> The effective frequency can still be observed via 'scaling_cur_freq' or
>> 'cpuinfo_cur_freq', preserving the distinction between "what was
>> requested" (setspeed) and "what is effective" (cur_freq).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pengjie Zhang <zhangpengjie2@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c | 4 +++-
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
>> index 77d62152cd38..4bd62e6c5c51 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_userspace.c
>> @@ -49,7 +49,9 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
>>   
>>   static ssize_t show_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>>   {
>> -	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
>> +	struct userspace_policy *userspace = policy->governor_data;
>> +
>> +	return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", userspace->setspeed);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> Looks okay to me.
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This fix is more reasonable. Each interface has its own responsibility 
and no repeat.
Acked-by: lihuisong@huawei.com