From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Robin Jarry <rjarry@redhat.com>,
Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 09:59:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f2424df-1846-6c38-e446-b3d5aa693ecd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230621072313.GA2046280@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 6/21/23 03:23, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:06:22AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Commit bf5835bcdb96 ("intel_idle: Disable IBRS during long idle")
>> disables IBRS when the CPU enters long idle. However, when a CPU becomes
>> offline, the IBRS bit is still set when X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS is
>> enabled. That will impact the performance of a sibling CPU. Mitigate
>> this performance impact by clearing all the mitigation bits in SPEC_CTRL
>> MSR when offline and restoring the value of the MSR when it becomes
>> online again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> index 352f0ce1ece4..5ff82fef413c 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@
>> #include <asm/hw_irq.h>
>> #include <asm/stackprotector.h>
>> #include <asm/sev.h>
>> +#include <asm/nospec-branch.h>
>>
>> /* representing HT siblings of each logical CPU */
>> DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
>> @@ -1838,12 +1839,24 @@ void __noreturn hlt_play_dead(void)
>>
>> void native_play_dead(void)
>> {
>> + u64 spec_ctrl = spec_ctrl_current();
>> +
>> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) {
>> + this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, 0);
>> + native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0);
>> + }
>> +
>> play_dead_common();
>> tboot_shutdown(TB_SHUTDOWN_WFS);
>>
>> mwait_play_dead();
>> if (cpuidle_play_dead())
>> hlt_play_dead();
>> +
>> + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) {
>> + native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, spec_ctrl);
>> + this_cpu_write(x86_spec_ctrl_current, spec_ctrl);
>> + }
>> }
> play_dead() is marked __noreturn
There are different versions of play_dead() in the kernel. Some of them
are indeed marked __noreturn like the non-SMP one in
arch/x86/kernel/process.c. The native_play_dead() that I am patching
isn't one of those.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-21 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-20 14:06 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/speculation: Disable IBRS when idle Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/speculation: Provide a debugfs file to dump SPEC_CTRL MSRs Waiman Long
2023-06-21 7:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 8:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-06-21 14:02 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 13:47 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS when cpu is offline Waiman Long
2023-06-21 7:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 13:59 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2023-06-21 14:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:44 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:51 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-21 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 15:42 ` Waiman Long
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] intel_idle: Sync up the SPEC_CTRL MSR value to x86_spec_ctrl_current Waiman Long
2023-06-21 7:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] intel_idle: Add no_ibrs module parameter to force disable IBRS Waiman Long
2023-06-21 7:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-20 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/idle: Disable IBRS entering mwait idle and enable it on wakeup Waiman Long
2023-06-21 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-06-21 14:05 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f2424df-1846-6c38-e446-b3d5aa693ecd@redhat.com \
--to=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmario@redhat.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome