From: Allison Henderson <achender@kernel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Dongliang Qin <cccccccccccc777777@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] rds: ib: Clear the sg list when mapping an MR fails
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 18:03:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f248beec60467591f9a25b2efe50b063cf8ccf5.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921165722.GY13925@horms.kernel.org>
On Mon, 2026-09-21 at 17:57 +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 02:34:49PM +0800, Dongliang Qin wrote:
> > rds_ib_map_frmr() stores the caller's scatterlist in the MR before DMA
> > mapping and registration can fail. On failure, __rds_rdma_map() unpins
> > the pages and frees the scatterlist, but rds_ib_free_frmr() can still
> > return the MR to the pool with the stale pointer set.
> >
> > This leaves the pool with a dangling scatterlist and can lead to local
> > privilege escalation. KASAN detects the resulting use-after-free when the
> > MR is later torn down:
> >
> > BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __rds_ib_teardown_mr
> > Read of size 8
> >
> > Call Trace:
> > __rds_ib_teardown_mr
> > rds_ib_unreg_frmr
> > rds_ib_flush_mr_pool
> > rds_ib_flush_mrs
> > rds_free_mr
> > rds_setsockopt
> >
> > Clear the scatterlist fields before returning an error so the caller
> > retains sole ownership of the scatterlist and its pinned pages. Route a
> > zero-length DMA mapping through the same cleanup path, and skip unmap
> > when no mapping was created.
> >
> > Fixes: 1659185fb4d0 ("RDS: IB: Support Fastreg MR (FRMR) memory registration mode")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Qin <cccccccccccc777777@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > net/rds/ib_frmr.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/rds/ib_frmr.c b/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> > index bd8611911..fea387952 100644
> > --- a/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> > +++ b/net/rds/ib_frmr.c
> > @@ -213,7 +213,8 @@ static int rds_ib_map_frmr(struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev,
> > DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > if (unlikely(!ibmr->sg_dma_len)) {
> > pr_warn("RDS/IB: %s failed!\n", __func__);
> > - return -EBUSY;
> > + ret = -EBUSY;
> > + goto out_unmap;
> > }
>
> Hi Dongliang,
>
> This approach leads to the complexity of a condition in the out_unmap
> label. I wonder if a cleaner approach would be to, instead, only store the
> scatterlist in the MR once mapping has succeeded.
>
> With such an approach I think that ibmr->sg and ibmr->sg_len would still
> need to be cleared in the error path. But neither the condition in the
> out_unmap label nor the hunk above would not be necessary. And I wonder
> if that would be a cleaner approach.
That sounds reasonable, the rds_ib_teardown_mr() at the top already leaves ibmr->sg
and ibmr->sg_len cleared. So if we move the ib_dma_map_sg() below it and do the check
and goto there, then we dont need the unmap in the out path. Just clear ibmr->sg and
ibmr->sg_len. I think that would be a lot simpler.
Thanks for working on this!
Allison
>
> >
> > frmr->sg_byte_len = 0;
> > @@ -261,9 +262,13 @@ static int rds_ib_map_frmr(struct rds_ib_device *rds_ibdev,
> > return ret;
> >
> > out_unmap:
> > - ib_dma_unmap_sg(rds_ibdev->dev, ibmr->sg, ibmr->sg_len,
> > - DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > - ibmr->sg_dma_len = 0;
> > + if (ibmr->sg_dma_len) {
> > + ib_dma_unmap_sg(rds_ibdev->dev, ibmr->sg, ibmr->sg_len,
> > + DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
> > + ibmr->sg_dma_len = 0;
> > + }
> > + ibmr->sg = NULL;
> > + ibmr->sg_len = 0;
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-20 6:34 Dongliang Qin
2026-09-21 16:57 ` Simon Horman
2026-09-22 1:03 ` Allison Henderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f248beec60467591f9a25b2efe50b063cf8ccf5.camel@kernel.org \
--to=achender@kernel.org \
--cc=cccccccccccc777777@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®