mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
To: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>,
	"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:29:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f35ca55-cbed-98ac-4988-1b783db21dc5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213101723.348289-1-lizetao1@huawei.com>


On 2022/12/13 18:17, Li Zetao wrote:
> There is a memory leaks reported by kmemleak:
> 
>   unreferenced object 0xffff888116111000 (size 2048):
>     comm "modprobe", pid 817, jiffies 4294759745 (age 76.502s)
>     hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>       00 c4 0a 04 81 88 ff ff 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff  ................
>       08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>     backtrace:
>       [<ffffffff815bcd82>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x60
>       [<ffffffff827e20ee>] phy_device_create+0x4e/0x90
>       [<ffffffff827e6072>] get_phy_device+0xd2/0x220
>       [<ffffffff827e7844>] mdiobus_scan+0xa4/0x2e0
>       [<ffffffff827e8be2>] __mdiobus_register+0x482/0x8b0
>       [<ffffffffa01f5d24>] r6040_init_one+0x714/0xd2c [r6040]
>       ...
> 
> The problem occurs in probe process as follows:
>   r6040_init_one:
>     mdiobus_register
>       mdiobus_scan    <- alloc and register phy_device,
>                          the reference count of phy_device is 3
>     r6040_mii_probe
>       phy_connect     <- connect to the first phy_device,
>                          so the reference count of the first
>                          phy_device is 4, others are 3
>     register_netdev   <- fault inject succeeded, goto error handling path
> 
>     // error handling path
>     err_out_mdio_unregister:
>       mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
>     err_out_mdio:
>       mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus);    <- the reference count of the first
>                                        phy_device is 1, it is not released
>                                        and other phy_devices are released
>   // similarly, the remove process also has the same problem
> 
> The root cause is traced to the phy_device is not disconnected when
> removes one r6040 device in r6040_remove_one() or on error handling path
> after r6040_mii probed successfully. In r6040_mii_probe(), a net ethernet
> device is connected to the first PHY device of mii_bus, in order to
> notify the connected driver when the link status changes, which is the
> default behavior of the PHY infrastructure to handle everything.
> Therefore the phy_device should be disconnected when removes one r6040
> device or on error handling path.
> 
> Fix it by adding phy_disconnect() when removes one r6040 device or on
> error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully.
> 
> Fixes: 3831861b4ad8 ("r6040: implement phylib")
> Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Please use [PATCH net] ... format in title.


> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> index eecd52ed1ed2..95b682597da1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> @@ -1159,10 +1159,12 @@ static int r6040_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  	err = register_netdev(dev);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register net device\n");
> -		goto err_out_mdio_unregister;
> +		goto err_out_r6040_mii_remove;

better to use something like 'err_out_phy_disconnect'

>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  
> +err_out_r6040_mii_remove:
> +	phy_disconnect(dev->phydev);
>  err_out_mdio_unregister:
>  	mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
>  err_out_mdio:
> @@ -1186,6 +1188,7 @@ static void r6040_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	struct r6040_private *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
>  
>  	unregister_netdev(dev);
> +	phy_disconnect(dev->phydev);
>  	mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
>  	mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus);
>  	netif_napi_del(&lp->napi);

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-13  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 10:17 Li Zetao
2022-12-13  9:29 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2022-12-13 12:56   ` [PATCH net v2] " Li Zetao
2022-12-14  7:14     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-15 12:00     ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f35ca55-cbed-98ac-4988-1b783db21dc5@huawei.com \
    --to=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®