From: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
To: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>,
"f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r6040: Fix kmemleak in probe and remove
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 17:29:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f35ca55-cbed-98ac-4988-1b783db21dc5@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213101723.348289-1-lizetao1@huawei.com>
On 2022/12/13 18:17, Li Zetao wrote:
> There is a memory leaks reported by kmemleak:
>
> unreferenced object 0xffff888116111000 (size 2048):
> comm "modprobe", pid 817, jiffies 4294759745 (age 76.502s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> 00 c4 0a 04 81 88 ff ff 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff ................
> 08 10 11 16 81 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff815bcd82>] kmalloc_trace+0x22/0x60
> [<ffffffff827e20ee>] phy_device_create+0x4e/0x90
> [<ffffffff827e6072>] get_phy_device+0xd2/0x220
> [<ffffffff827e7844>] mdiobus_scan+0xa4/0x2e0
> [<ffffffff827e8be2>] __mdiobus_register+0x482/0x8b0
> [<ffffffffa01f5d24>] r6040_init_one+0x714/0xd2c [r6040]
> ...
>
> The problem occurs in probe process as follows:
> r6040_init_one:
> mdiobus_register
> mdiobus_scan <- alloc and register phy_device,
> the reference count of phy_device is 3
> r6040_mii_probe
> phy_connect <- connect to the first phy_device,
> so the reference count of the first
> phy_device is 4, others are 3
> register_netdev <- fault inject succeeded, goto error handling path
>
> // error handling path
> err_out_mdio_unregister:
> mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
> err_out_mdio:
> mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus); <- the reference count of the first
> phy_device is 1, it is not released
> and other phy_devices are released
> // similarly, the remove process also has the same problem
>
> The root cause is traced to the phy_device is not disconnected when
> removes one r6040 device in r6040_remove_one() or on error handling path
> after r6040_mii probed successfully. In r6040_mii_probe(), a net ethernet
> device is connected to the first PHY device of mii_bus, in order to
> notify the connected driver when the link status changes, which is the
> default behavior of the PHY infrastructure to handle everything.
> Therefore the phy_device should be disconnected when removes one r6040
> device or on error handling path.
>
> Fix it by adding phy_disconnect() when removes one r6040 device or on
> error handling path after r6040_mii probed successfully.
>
> Fixes: 3831861b4ad8 ("r6040: implement phylib")
> Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Please use [PATCH net] ... format in title.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> index eecd52ed1ed2..95b682597da1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rdc/r6040.c
> @@ -1159,10 +1159,12 @@ static int r6040_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
> err = register_netdev(dev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register net device\n");
> - goto err_out_mdio_unregister;
> + goto err_out_r6040_mii_remove;
better to use something like 'err_out_phy_disconnect'
> }
> return 0;
>
> +err_out_r6040_mii_remove:
> + phy_disconnect(dev->phydev);
> err_out_mdio_unregister:
> mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
> err_out_mdio:
> @@ -1186,6 +1188,7 @@ static void r6040_remove_one(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct r6040_private *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
>
> unregister_netdev(dev);
> + phy_disconnect(dev->phydev);
> mdiobus_unregister(lp->mii_bus);
> mdiobus_free(lp->mii_bus);
> netif_napi_del(&lp->napi);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 9:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 10:17 Li Zetao
2022-12-13 9:29 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2022-12-13 12:56 ` [PATCH net v2] " Li Zetao
2022-12-14 7:14 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-15 12:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f35ca55-cbed-98ac-4988-1b783db21dc5@huawei.com \
--to=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®