mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) merge setup functions
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 10:49:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f3fc06f-cf4e-2dc6-e68a-917117fe8895@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAB95QASWWMvSSuuwQU=TwZX-QcU=hRPCJVQ0E6Bh29sc4d66Ug@mail.gmail.com>

On 2/16/22 10:23, Eugene Shalygin wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2022 at 19:08, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> $ scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict asus-ec
> 
> So, contributors have to use the --strict option?
> 
>> WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> 
> The file is full of such braces, because I like them and it is only a
> warning. How should I proceed with them?
> 

Warnings are also seen without --strict; that only adds the CHECK messages.
You should follow Linux kernel coding style when you write kernel code,
not your personal preferences. Also please consider reading
Documentation/hwmon/submitting-patches.rst, which specifically says

* Please run your patch through 'checkpatch --strict'. There should be no
   errors, no warnings, and few if any check messages. If there are any
   messages, please be prepared to explain.

* If your patch generates checkpatch errors, warnings, or check messages,
   please refrain from explanations such as "I prefer that coding style".
   Keep in mind that each unnecessary message helps hiding a real problem,
   and a consistent coding style makes it easier for others to understand
   and review the code.

Thanks,
Guenter

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-16 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-16 18:08 Guenter Roeck
2022-02-16 18:23 ` Eugene Shalygin
2022-02-16 18:49   ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2022-02-16 19:00     ` Eugene Shalygin
2022-02-16 19:13       ` Guenter Roeck
2022-02-16 19:17         ` Eugene Shalygin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-02-16 17:15 Eugene Shalygin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f3fc06f-cf4e-2dc6-e68a-917117fe8895@roeck-us.net \
    --to=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=eugene.shalygin@gmail.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®