mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
	kernel@xen0n.name, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Set vcpu_is_preempted() macro rather than function
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:47:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f4c6ef8-b24f-88c5-82f2-e00d1629ae4c@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H6p=bArdYHkE-0s55Ogvm+Dtv8TVVCLAHGeqA-pnPOXwA@mail.gmail.com>



On 2026/3/11 上午11:35, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 11:21 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> vcpu_is_preempted() is performance sensitive called in function
>> osq_lock(), here set it as macro. So that parameter is not parsed
>> at most time, it can avoid cache line thrashing across numa node.
> I remember that I had suggested you define vcpu_is_preempted() in the
> header file but you refused.
yes, I refuse then, that is a tragedy, I am sorry for that:(

By some benchmarks, vcpu_is_preempted() is called in busy-loop method, 
more obvious with more CPUs, it may be a bottleneck.

Regards
Bibo Mao

> 
> Huacai
> 
>>
>> Here is part of unixbench result on 3C5000 DualWay machine with 32
>> Cores and 2 Numa node.
>>            origin    with patch    CONFIG_PARAVIRT disabled
>> execl     6871.9    7134.2        7190.8
>> fstime    425.5     959.9         956.1
>>
>>  From the test result, with macro method it is almost the same with
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT disabled, and there is some improvment compared with
>> function method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>>   arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c       | 15 ++------------
>>   2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> index 66244801db67..305afd37cdcb 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> @@ -5,8 +5,10 @@
>>   #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>> -
>> +#include <asm/kvm_para.h>
>>   DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_spin_lock_key);
>> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time);
>>
>>   #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
>>
>> @@ -34,10 +36,25 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>>          return true;
>>   }
>>
>> -#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>> -
>> -bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu);
>> -
>> +/*
>> + * Macro is better than inline function here
>> + * With inline function, parameter cpu is parsed even though it is not used.
>> + * This may cause cache line thrashing across NUMA node.
>> + * With macro method, parameter cpu is parsed only when it is used.
>> + */
>> +#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu)                                         \
>> +({                                                                     \
>> +       bool __val;                                                     \
>> +                                                                       \
>> +       if (!static_branch_unlikely(&virt_preempt_key))                 \
>> +               __val = false;                                          \
>> +       else {                                                          \
>> +               struct kvm_steal_time *src;                             \
>> +               src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);                        \
>> +               __val = !!(src->preempted & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED);        \
>> +       }                                                               \
>> +       __val;                                                          \
>> +})
>>   #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
>>
>>   #include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> index b74fe6db49ab..2d1206e486e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
>>   #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>
>>   static int has_steal_clock;
>> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
>> -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
>> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>>   DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_spin_lock_key);
>>
>>   static bool steal_acc = true;
>> @@ -261,17 +261,6 @@ static int pv_time_cpu_down_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
>>          return 0;
>>   }
>>
>> -bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
>> -{
>> -       struct kvm_steal_time *src;
>> -
>> -       if (!static_branch_unlikely(&virt_preempt_key))
>> -               return false;
>> -
>> -       src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
>> -       return !!(src->preempted & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED);
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vcpu_is_preempted);
>>   #endif
>>
>>   static void pv_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-11  3:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-11  3:18 [PATCH 0/3] LoongArch: KVM: Some small enhanments Bibo Mao
2026-03-11  3:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] LoongArch: KVM: Add kvm_request_pending checking in kvm_late_check_requests() Bibo Mao
2026-03-11  3:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] LoongArch: KVM: Move host CSR_EENTRY save in context switch Bibo Mao
2026-03-11  3:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Set vcpu_is_preempted() macro rather than function Bibo Mao
2026-03-11  3:35   ` Huacai Chen
2026-03-11  3:47     ` Bibo Mao [this message]
2026-03-11  4:38       ` Huacai Chen
2026-03-11  6:30         ` Bibo Mao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f4c6ef8-b24f-88c5-82f2-e00d1629ae4c@loongson.cn \
    --to=maobibo@loongson.cn \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®