From: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@loongson.cn>,
kernel@xen0n.name, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Set vcpu_is_preempted() macro rather than function
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 11:47:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f4c6ef8-b24f-88c5-82f2-e00d1629ae4c@loongson.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H6p=bArdYHkE-0s55Ogvm+Dtv8TVVCLAHGeqA-pnPOXwA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026/3/11 上午11:35, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Bibo,
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 11:21 AM Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> wrote:
>>
>> vcpu_is_preempted() is performance sensitive called in function
>> osq_lock(), here set it as macro. So that parameter is not parsed
>> at most time, it can avoid cache line thrashing across numa node.
> I remember that I had suggested you define vcpu_is_preempted() in the
> header file but you refused.
yes, I refuse then, that is a tragedy, I am sorry for that:(
By some benchmarks, vcpu_is_preempted() is called in busy-loop method,
more obvious with more CPUs, it may be a bottleneck.
Regards
Bibo Mao
>
> Huacai
>
>>
>> Here is part of unixbench result on 3C5000 DualWay machine with 32
>> Cores and 2 Numa node.
>> origin with patch CONFIG_PARAVIRT disabled
>> execl 6871.9 7134.2 7190.8
>> fstime 425.5 959.9 956.1
>>
>> From the test result, with macro method it is almost the same with
>> CONFIG_PARAVIRT disabled, and there is some improvment compared with
>> function method.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c | 15 ++------------
>> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> index 66244801db67..305afd37cdcb 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/qspinlock.h
>> @@ -5,8 +5,10 @@
>> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>> -
>> +#include <asm/kvm_para.h>
>> DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_spin_lock_key);
>> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time);
>>
>> #define virt_spin_lock virt_spin_lock
>>
>> @@ -34,10 +36,25 @@ static inline bool virt_spin_lock(struct qspinlock *lock)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> -#define vcpu_is_preempted vcpu_is_preempted
>> -
>> -bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu);
>> -
>> +/*
>> + * Macro is better than inline function here
>> + * With inline function, parameter cpu is parsed even though it is not used.
>> + * This may cause cache line thrashing across NUMA node.
>> + * With macro method, parameter cpu is parsed only when it is used.
>> + */
>> +#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) \
>> +({ \
>> + bool __val; \
>> + \
>> + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&virt_preempt_key)) \
>> + __val = false; \
>> + else { \
>> + struct kvm_steal_time *src; \
>> + src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu); \
>> + __val = !!(src->preempted & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED); \
>> + } \
>> + __val; \
>> +})
>> #endif /* CONFIG_PARAVIRT */
>>
>> #include <asm-generic/qspinlock.h>
>> diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> index b74fe6db49ab..2d1206e486e2 100644
>> --- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> +++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/paravirt.c
>> @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
>> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>
>> static int has_steal_clock;
>> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
>> -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvm_steal_time, steal_time) __aligned(64);
>> +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_preempt_key);
>> DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(virt_spin_lock_key);
>>
>> static bool steal_acc = true;
>> @@ -261,17 +261,6 @@ static int pv_time_cpu_down_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -bool vcpu_is_preempted(int cpu)
>> -{
>> - struct kvm_steal_time *src;
>> -
>> - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&virt_preempt_key))
>> - return false;
>> -
>> - src = &per_cpu(steal_time, cpu);
>> - return !!(src->preempted & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED);
>> -}
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(vcpu_is_preempted);
>> #endif
>>
>> static void pv_cpu_reboot(void *unused)
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-11 3:18 [PATCH 0/3] LoongArch: KVM: Some small enhanments Bibo Mao
2026-03-11 3:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] LoongArch: KVM: Add kvm_request_pending checking in kvm_late_check_requests() Bibo Mao
2026-03-11 3:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] LoongArch: KVM: Move host CSR_EENTRY save in context switch Bibo Mao
2026-03-11 3:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] LoongArch: KVM: Set vcpu_is_preempted() macro rather than function Bibo Mao
2026-03-11 3:35 ` Huacai Chen
2026-03-11 3:47 ` Bibo Mao [this message]
2026-03-11 4:38 ` Huacai Chen
2026-03-11 6:30 ` Bibo Mao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f4c6ef8-b24f-88c5-82f2-e00d1629ae4c@loongson.cn \
--to=maobibo@loongson.cn \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@xen0n.name \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loongarch@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=zhaotianrui@loongson.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®