Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] MFD/ASoC: Add support for Intel Bay Trail boards with WM5102 codec

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 2/4/21 11:57 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Feb 2021, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On 1/20/21 10:49 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Here is v4 of my series to add support for Intel Bay Trail based devices
>>> which use a WM5102 codec for audio output/input.
>>>
>>> This was developed and tested on a Lenovo Yoga Tablet 1051L.
>>>
>>> The MFD and ASoC parts do not have any build-time dependencies
>>> on each other. But the follow-up jack-detect series does have
>>> patches depending on each-other and on this series. So IMHO it
>>> would be best if this entire series would be merged through the
>>> MFD tree to make merging the follow-up series easier.
>>>
>>> Mark, if that is ok with you (and you are happy with the ASoC
>>> changes) can you please Ack this ?
>>
>> I believe that this series and the follow-up:
>>
>> "[PATCH v4 00/13] MFD/extcon/ASoC: Rework arizona codec jack-detect support"
>>
>> series are both ready for merging. All patches have Reviewed-by and/or
>> Acked-by tags now.
> 
> I don't think they do.  You're missing ASoC and Extcon Acks.

Right, what I meant is that the patches have been reviewed by other
stake-holders, including the follow-up series being tested by the cirrus
codec folks (thank you Charles).

But yes the actual subsys maintainers have not acked these yet;
and I'm aware that you will need those for merging this through
the MFD tree.

Note that this series only requires Mark ack, the follow-up
also touches extcon code, this one is purely MFD + ASoC patches.

> Not sure why *this* set fell through the cracks though.  However, it's
> now on my to-review list.
> 
> If I can work fast enough, maybe this series can get into 5.12, but
> the follow-up still needs reviews.
> 
> It might be best to collect the *-bys you do have and [RESEND].

Ok, will do.

>> I guess it is too late for 5.12, but it would be nice to at least formulate
>> a plan for getting this merged after 5.12-rc1 is out. Given the
>> interdependencies I still believe that it is best to merge all the patches
>> through the mfd tree and then have Lee provide an immutable branch for the
>> other subsystems to merge.
> 
> Yes, that's fine.
> 
>> Mark and extcon-maintainers (for the follow-up series) may we have your ack
>> for merging these through the MFD tree ?
> 
> Ah, you noticed that too!

Ack :)

Regards,

Hans