Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix hs_phy_irq for QUSB2 targets

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 26/01/2024 15:14, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/25/2024 3:16 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 12:49:01AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>> On several QUSB2 Targets, the hs_phy_irq mentioned is actually
>>> qusb2_phy interrupt specific to QUSB2 PHY's. Rename hs_phy_irq
>>> to qusb2_phy for such targets.
>>>
>>> In actuality, the hs_phy_irq is also present in these targets, but
>>> kept in for debug purposes in hw test environments. This is not
>>> triggered by default and its functionality is mutually exclusive
>>> to that of qusb2_phy interrupt.
>>>
>>> Add missing hs_phy_irq's, pwr_event irq's for QUSB2 PHY targets.
>>> Add missing ss_phy_irq on some targets which allows for remote
>>> wakeup to work on a Super Speed link.
>>>
>>> Also modify order of interrupts in accordance to bindings update.
>>> Since driver looks up for interrupts by name and not by index, it
>>> is safe to modify order of these interrupts in the DT.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq8074.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi |  7 +++++--
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8996.dtsi |  8 ++++++--
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi |  7 +++++--
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm630.dtsi  | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6115.dtsi  |  9 +++++++--
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi  |  9 +++++++--
>>>   8 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>> index 5e1277fea725..ea70b57d1871 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>>> @@ -418,6 +418,12 @@ usb2: usb@70f8800 {
>>>   					  <&gcc GCC_USB1_MOCK_UTMI_CLK>;
>>>   			assigned-clock-rates = <133330000>,
>>>   					       <24000000>;
>>> +
>>> +			interrupts-extended = <GIC_SPI 128 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
>>
>> interrupts-extended takes a reference to a interrupt-controller as well,
>> so this doesn't build.
>>
>> Did you mean "interrupts" here instead? Please update these and build
>> test...
>>
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
>   Thanks for the catch. I was using DTC version 1.4.0.

v1.4.0? I am sorry, but what?

Isn't that like 10 years old? What systems are you using there? I am
asking, because maybe we should be rejecting DTS patches assuming they
were never tested (testing on ancient dtc counts like no testing).

> When I moved to 1.5.0, I did see these warnings. Fixed them up and sent v3.

Nope, you just moved from 10 years old to 5 years old.

Fix your systems and use the recent one. v1.6.1



Best regards,
Krzysztof