From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-io1-f42.google.com (mail-io1-f42.google.com [209.85.166.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 583BD136664 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711058456; cv=none; b=FaVXeDjZ90Hr3ogrcJ/SQleTXPBcbckXuyjwFMhGD4gXDFijinDFFEnw9cmJhAmi1pCoHTGeCkPnATnKMh5VjjtYvRfDq1KOvaFrep6vtmq215igzqjaBjVhyBVT908/t40+A6QOmhmBAr7FlgVFImaWQmPe9LMMBGy7PUB2+IA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1711058456; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XjhRN1+WliKb2nvUCXcCau0ZReNDce3iYf1kyUq3i3w=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JCLddIA4bw0dH7MPwXbvZupalry92hVn41di0oNObn5p1O/3XATqZU2wG7LgLaPvipt2RBKKkeMSN28XPVxuVv246pzX/PyGI1wruMJf4fMgf5OxYydvymxvixBmbeaLnZn7uZsZvw/9XkWCCPOoNbsthQ5SaVq1jYZDcsWllQc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=turingpi.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=turingpi.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=turingpi.com header.i=@turingpi.com header.b=fjbZNqCR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.166.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=turingpi.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=turingpi.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=turingpi.com header.i=@turingpi.com header.b="fjbZNqCR" Received: by mail-io1-f42.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7c8d2e0e9cfso46866039f.1 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:00:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=turingpi.com; s=google; t=1711058454; x=1711663254; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RDnR0b5/BmLqe7zAvxDaQSE6Q7NTU8rgOYXFYBY8gfs=; b=fjbZNqCRxHgQZImxUQkjRzQ1rznmLz44q27VcG0EMd1bSvvJ1A+0p1nM2kwh5jeu6e 1x/1B6RgH9XLVKIfWvx9QYf/sCp0mry8QjeHdrZmCyw3devuXB1/YcrcFdNP60T+fsVY 1bvX4BF+SZvvBN3rC45rW1SelsWF+RYQCMadbJF4J+/WbBoi/LU4/be2Dmx2ftgv0uqZ Tdk58DZ13RcyOvwvfNLDzjVIYoYwBcRrKmcUkWZo1dy4WbcavB2Nwi4ZduuAbKynTTtK j+82nkJ76/NqryWYVdlRbxXn4Ppu0prddtcFubvmuNVxMwV9FoaE2fW03zfGYw7T/kLC XFug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711058454; x=1711663254; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RDnR0b5/BmLqe7zAvxDaQSE6Q7NTU8rgOYXFYBY8gfs=; b=m2U6zQpGWRmGufOmYgOortrTRdpCneiuuySKJK9lmP/Lg8SBrk+bzc8aO7vepVdl/W pMD3St1OtbxICvqwEmxstf5IejtbeSrja2yFujkl7+m+bUnqSAq4qr4bybasPd5qG+tV ntY+6Q7Hltdb5pr3D05yJWDp1SkbjZcNAlpaVHW6ZYPTf3ZW0S8tiyfVomJhl7teeAb2 46PO4sGfj6O0L+6q8ffDWCz3byuUsucuL8CxXb8DLNXr2zfwnfKT0UesDaSdrUl5djl7 9cmmnlYahdfLoOMsqSp0ZrpWSXn7jV7qX2sSkqFxCf8pGqiKZS25ZxDHxdJAI0FQ8iik XH1g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUOlQu/rviGdNJKc2tbEWSE357HY7Zx7BtRrgjycV3YZQPAfBh/+SDh7VlVQjbCoDqHn0ncL6uM6buLSZbbxSxm75hGjLyYTxe/4zhT X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQAYWzwvfqLw/9PEwOsGE1x4B8+M/50aNowjk2LPGdoaBsh5ME 1TgpQLOArE8BswsDuJ+gASyDt4yLGfy+9OtpevobqD/Jy1gnPboismAeIB8Wz00= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFZmr8k83heK3kERn+YqBvzq+IWT5js+OQoZpX6PhjnSxOryVi8zm4Z1y68gxiLg2m/CRXmfg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6e1a:0:b0:7cb:ffd4:6784 with SMTP id d26-20020a6b6e1a000000b007cbffd46784mr782605ioh.21.1711058454357; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:470:42c4:101:5977:3c90:314a:e5da? ([2001:470:42c4:101:5977:3c90:314a:e5da]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l24-20020a056638221800b00476e6c429e5sm140358jas.121.2024.03.21.15.00.53 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7f7866f8-514b-4659-920a-30b566ad157d@turingpi.com> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:00:53 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 0/5] Enhancements for mv64xxx I2C driver Content-Language: en-US To: Andi Shyti Cc: Gregory CLEMENT , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <4a043be8-8e88-4b92-913c-abd8f138b90d@turingpi.com> From: Sam Edwards In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Andi, On 3/21/24 14:54, Andi Shyti wrote: > so that it's the [RFC v2 ...] the right series... are you sure? [RESEND v2 RFC ...] -- it's the second resend (thus third send), not the second RFC (in retrospect I definitely should have used # instead of v) > > The order of arrival is: > > 1. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:51:51 -0600 > 2. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:40:51 -0600 > 3. Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 22:19:53 -0600 > > Anyway, I will take "1" as the good one, being a v2. I will > discard "2" and "3". > > Then, please, do not forget next time the patch 0 and the > changelog. Patch 0 was probably separated by the lack of threading but can be found here: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg68235.html There is no changelog as there were no changes to the patch content vs. either of the first two sending attempts; I was only trying a different way of navigating the minefield of mail agents that make whitespace changes without my consent. :) > > ... > >>> Can you please make sure, next time (unless someone asks to >>> resend them again), that the patches are threaded? You can send >>> them to yourself first and see if they are really threaded. >> >> Yes, definitely. I take it from your phrasing that you're willing to collect >> the scattered mails yourself this one time only? If so, thank you for >> cleaning up after my mess. :) >> >> If not (and/or if someone else doesn't like the mess), I can always resend. >> I have already made one cleanup (removing the useless `default:` at the end >> of the FSM) so I guess it would technically be an "RFC v2" at this point. > > For now no need to resend (unless someone complains). Let's give > it some time for review. > > Andi Thanks again, Sam