mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@huawei.com>
To: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev] ipv6: Make sure tcp accept_queue's spinlocks are initialized
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 19:12:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f963ac6-28ef-376c-e20d-bdfaedefba36@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240122102322.1131826-1-wenst@chromium.org>

Hi Chen-Yu Tsai:
	I have send the fixed patch.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240122102001.2851701-1-shaozhengchao@huawei.com/
Thank you

Zhengchao Shao

On 2024/1/22 18:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Commit 198bc90e0e73 ("tcp: make sure init the accept_queue's spinlocks
> once") moved the TCP accept_queue spinlock initialization from a common
> core function to two places for two cases: the common accept callback,
> and the socket create callback.
> 
> For the second case, only AF_INET (IPv4) was considered. This results
> in a lockdep error when accepting an incoming IPv6 TCP connection.
> 
>      INFO: trying to register non-static key.
>      The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
>      you didn't initialize this object before use?
>      turning off the locking correctness validator.
>      Call trace:
>      ... <stack dump> ...
>      register_lock_class (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:977 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1289)
>      __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5014)
>      lock_acquire (./arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5756 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5719)
>      _raw_spin_lock (./include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:134 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:154)
>      inet_csk_complete_hashdance (net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1303 net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c:1355)
>      tcp_check_req (net/ipv4/tcp_minisocks.c:653)
>      tcp_v6_rcv (net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c:1837)
>      ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:438)
>      ip6_input_finish (./include/linux/rcupdate.h:779 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:484)
>      ip6_input (./include/linux/netfilter.h:314 ./include/linux/netfilter.h:308 net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:492)
>      ip6_sublist_rcv_finish (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:86 (discriminator 3))
>      ip6_sublist_rcv (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:317)
>      ipv6_list_rcv (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:326)
>      __netif_receive_skb_list_core (net/core/dev.c:5577 net/core/dev.c:5625)
>      netif_receive_skb_list_internal (net/core/dev.c:5679 net/core/dev.c:5768)
>      napi_complete_done (./include/linux/list.h:37 (discriminator 2) ./include/net/gro.h:440 (discriminator 2) ./include/net/gro.h:435 (discriminator 2) net/core/dev.c:6108 (discriminator 2))
>      ... <device callback> ...
> 
> Fix this by adding the appropriate code to AF_INET6 (IPv6) socket create
> callback, mirroring what was added for AF_INET.
> 
> Fixes: 198bc90e0e73 ("tcp: make sure init the accept_queue's spinlocks once")
> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>
> ---
>   net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> index 13a1833a4df5..959bfd9f6344 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,9 @@ static int inet6_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
>   	if (INET_PROTOSW_REUSE & answer_flags)
>   		sk->sk_reuse = SK_CAN_REUSE;
>   
> +	if (INET_PROTOSW_ICSK & answer_flags)
> +		inet_init_csk_locks(sk);
> +
>   	inet = inet_sk(sk);
>   	inet_assign_bit(IS_ICSK, sk, INET_PROTOSW_ICSK & answer_flags);
>   

      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-22 10:23 Chen-Yu Tsai
2024-01-22 11:12 ` shaozhengchao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7f963ac6-28ef-376c-e20d-bdfaedefba36@huawei.com \
    --to=shaozhengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=wenst@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®