From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
kernel-dev@igalia.com,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>, Chia-I Wu <olv@google.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] workqueue: Add support for real-time workers
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 08:37:40 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fec5fa8362328bf3356a077a8bd9687@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d6add80-2ec9-4f29-a815-ad0e955f7b5a@igalia.com>
Hello, Tvrtko.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2026 at 09:33:42AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> Can do. I'll get to it the week after next. (Tweaks to other patches in
> the series as well.) Should I switch to a different base branch by then?
I just branched wq/for-7.5. That should work as the base.
> But if you are curious how much better strict
> affinity makes them I can measure, it is not a huge effort.
Yes, numbers with and without strict affinity would be great.
> Hmm.. I could do that, but since the tool ships within the kernel does
> it _need_ to have backward compatibility regarding kernel _internal_
> implementation details?
It's just a nice-to-have, but other parts of the script already support
older kernels, so falling back would be good if it doesn't add too much
complexity.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 9:38 [PATCH v7 0/4] Realtime workqueues and panthor realtime submission Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-22 9:38 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] workqueue: Simplify unbound sysfs attribute registration Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-23 13:14 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-10-23 21:04 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-22 9:38 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] workqueue: Separate sysfs mutable vs immutable wq attribute sanitizing Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-23 13:17 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-10-23 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-22 9:38 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] workqueue: Add support for real-time workers Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-23 13:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2026-10-23 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2026-10-24 8:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-26 18:37 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-22 9:38 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] drm/panthor: Create per queue priority workqueues Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-10-23 13:26 ` Liviu Dudau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fec5fa8362328bf3356a077a8bd9687@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=include@grrlz.net \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=olv@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®