From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: s3c/gpio: complete the conversion to new GPIO value setters
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 10:46:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ff48289-f738-420e-ac69-de544833725b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250730071443.8758-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
On 30/07/2025 09:14, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> Commit fb52f3226cab ("ARM: s3c/gpio: use new line value setter
> callbacks") correctly changed the assignment of the callback but missed
> the check one liner higher. Change it now too to using the recommended
> callback as the legacy one is going away soon.
>
> Fixes: fb52f3226cab ("ARM: s3c/gpio: use new line value setter callbacks")
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---
> Autobuilders pointed out only now that I missed the other line that
> needs changing in my previous patch. I'd like to still queue this for
> v6.17. Either through the SoC tree if it's not too late or through the
> GPIO tree together with my second PR for this merge window. Please
> kindly ack it.
This does not apply for current RC, so on top of v6.17-rc1.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 7:14 Bartosz Golaszewski
2025-08-11 8:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-08-11 8:47 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ff48289-f738-420e-ac69-de544833725b@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®