mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henrik Christian Grove <grove@fsr.ku.dk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: /proc/net/tcp not updated fast enough?
Date: 27 Oct 2004 12:21:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7gekjkpilo.fsf@serena.fsr.ku.dk> (raw)


Hi

I'm writing a SMTP proxy that needs to know the uid of the user
connecting (only connections from the same machine is supposed to work).

I find the uid by searching /proc/net/tcp, for a line having a
0100007F:<port I get from accept on the socket I listen on> as
local_address and <any-ip>:<the port I listen on> as rem_address, and
that works perfectly -- most of the time.

I have it running on 11[1] machines and since midnight (it's 11:47 here
now) I have 2397 succesfull connections, but in 31 cases (that's 1,29%
of the connections - and thus not totally ignorable) I had to read
through /proc/net/tcp twice to find the uid. Does that sound plausible,
or more like I'm doing something wrong?

If it's plausible, how long can it take for /proc/net/tcp to get the
info? I'm asking because I see one connection (again since midnight)
where I don't find any uid in the 5 attempts I do as a max.

If it's plausible could it explain why I have 9 connections apparently
coming from root, although they seem to come from a program _not_
running as root? Here "seem" means that I have tried logging the
(relevant parts of the) output from `netstat -tnp` when I got these
connections and the pid was the pid of a program I've written myself,
that would complain in the log if it were running as root.
(There's also a single connection from uid 33 (that's a uid apache runs
as) and one from uid 99 (unused), but they are so rare I haven't tried
tracing them yet).

It wasn't until yesterday that I started suspecting /proc/net/tcp from
"lagging", so I don't have reliable numbers from yesterday.

The machines run a 2.4.25 kernel with vserver-patches (the proxy
actually runs in a vserver).

.Henrik

[1] Actually one of them has only been running since around 4:45 this
morning, but that shouldn't matter.

-- 
"Det er fundamentalt noget humanistisk vås, at der er noget, 
 der hedder blød matematik."
   --- citat Henrik Jeppesen, dekan for det naturvidenskabelige fakultet

             reply	other threads:[~2004-10-27 10:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-27 10:21 Henrik Christian Grove [this message]
2004-10-27 12:15 ` Herbert Xu
     [not found] <2TTnT-7q3-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <2TV6i-i1-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-10-27 14:14   ` Henrik Christian Grove

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7gekjkpilo.fsf@serena.fsr.ku.dk \
    --to=grove@fsr.ku.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®