Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Use CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME in core code

[Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>]

"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes:

> Hi,
>
> After commit b2b49ccbdd54 "PM: Kconfig: Set PM_RUNTIME if PM_SLEEP is
> selected" (currently in Linux next) CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is set whenever
> CONFIG_PM is set, so CONFIG_PM can be used in #ifdefs instead of
> CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME which simplifies things in quite a few cases.
>
> For this reason, the following patches modify some core code to use
> CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME.
>
> [1/4] Drop a macro which is redundant after the above commit.
> [2/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the core device PM code.
> [3/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the ACPI core.
> [4/4] Use PM instead of PM_RUNTIME in the PCI core.
>
> They build for me for all of the relevant combinations of options (on x86),
> but more testing (on the other architectures) would be welcome.

Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>

I gave this a quick boot test on all the OMAP boards I have, and it's
booting fine. As soon as this hits linux-next, it will be boot tested on
a pile of different ARM platforms, and will let you know what happens.

Kevin