From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1394CC2D0BF for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:13:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7C9207FF for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 18:13:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Ax41RgSa" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727761AbfLJSNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:13:20 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f65.google.com ([209.85.216.65]:45968 "EHLO mail-pj1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727349AbfLJSNU (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:13:20 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f65.google.com with SMTP id r11so7697672pjp.12 for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:13:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baylibre-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=4lLGRmsliIpZ0UpKU0IEWW602jVUv7+6lHITbij3O5Y=; b=Ax41RgSauchkK4JBfY5KiQhx0ZqAGsHlTIabiht9+ufmYPy0A/k6fzpIOehD7/e1BZ rVNN9fQqcCTUysbKXiB+vDRvErr1DyzQPtKiTYcJqj2GHjmATSk3qucVeOLVRCkOhEIu K5dAVffJQTTNp4WTUL3ki2V3LvaaviZN1KCbOON0El12ZWTLGoM+UwftSpRs5Plgaxb3 JVbzGapJbO730NFVsQnawfZ+KVkgcjfTaxggwi194/nxW0zjNi9K7TZVjJ07vcCzE4r5 L/qmEmEiYuVsMLunBZzzlhPYONXzzXDmajP/VEpXPY6582YOziMrl931APa+/HAqnF5W wXGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=4lLGRmsliIpZ0UpKU0IEWW602jVUv7+6lHITbij3O5Y=; b=dNBH5Uijm4WPGjQEhta3aMKUPUHRFVqkOtVqZnsFyhxeW8ElZRrmK8N1OXT82xqGnH YOmn71fiWn7uflFYiA47HYHb+whO6PY8IxJ82GetmkBAU4H9EokasnKr/6KMvHaRXpEH U70qvpXVNUT8NtczAXUfy6gmJuGddOtXCUOgiJF4nzKa3ltIU8z6lZYl5njB6vTSRM3X g4P7U72rHBNJbGSsM3ayf+KlzgQRRj6+GGHxBCW/1AtSV4W6PmxUUZHWCI+iWI0D4QEU GQvBMhsuBvuSimMZ+Ue2G8H/X5FLEzaaVZUkw0G1uTwydHr6jtKHAXM6XPPhlHA3hQTj plBg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWhGf9tFTNkGU6LNHJDzDc4/icGsewBZMUBjTpyTT1kUKe4tmaY iW/uW9VC26VYOVHPFd0n5SGvRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJRm4sHGA5uWrmJ+2D9cTFf8Qb8j2tRTkfuT9957FR3ONic55nbNNuLrP58IxTnaW0jHeS9g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b611:: with SMTP id b17mr22648668pls.210.1576001599750; Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:13:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-71-197-186-152.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [71.197.186.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u123sm1382107pfb.109.2019.12.10.10.13.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:13:18 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Hilman To: Anand Moon , Neil Armstrong Cc: Rob Herring , Martin Blumenstingl , Jerome Brunet , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [RFC-next 0/1] Odroid C2: Enable DVFS for cpu In-Reply-To: References: <20191101143126.2549-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com> <7hfthtrvvv.fsf@baylibre.com> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:13:18 -0800 Message-ID: <7hfthsqcap.fsf@baylibre.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anand Moon writes: > Hi Neil / Kevin, > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 at 14:13, Neil Armstrong wrote: >> >> On 09/12/2019 23:12, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> > Anand Moon writes: >> > >> >> Some how this patch got lost, so resend this again. >> >> >> >> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11136545/ >> >> >> >> This patch enable DVFS on GXBB Odroid C2. >> >> >> >> DVFS has been tested by running the arm64 cpuburn >> >> [1] https://github.com/ssvb/cpuburn-arm/blob/master/cpuburn-a53.S >> >> PM-QA testing >> >> [2] https://git.linaro.org/power/pm-qa.git [cpufreq testcase] >> >> >> >> Tested on latest U-Boot 2019.07-1 (Aug 01 2019 - 23:58:01 +0000) Arch Linux ARM >> > >> > Have you tested with the Harkernel u-boot? >> > >> > Last I remember, enabling CPUfreq will cause system hangs with the >> > Hardkernel u-boot because of improperly enabled frequencies, so I'm not >> > terribly inclined to merge this patch. > > HK u-boot have many issue with loading the kernel, with load address > *it's really hard to build the kernel for HK u-boot*, > to get the configuration correctly. > > Well I have tested with mainline u-boot with latest ATF . > I would prefer mainline u-boot for all the Amlogic SBC, since > they sync with latest driver changes. Yes, we would all prefer mainline u-boot, but the mainline kernel needs to support the vendor u-boot that is shipping with the boards. So until Hardkernel (and other vendors) switch to mainline u-boot we do not want to have upstream kernel defaults that will not boot with the vendor u-boot. We can always support these features, but they just cannot be enabled by default. Kevin