From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vishalm@ti.com,
sebin.francis@ti.com, d-gole@ti.com,
Devarsh Thakkar <devarsht@ti.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] pmdomain: ti-sci: Set PD on/off state according to the HW state
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 13:04:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hmsilqrw3.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241022-tisci-pd-boot-state-v1-1-849a6384131b@ideasonboard.com>
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com> writes:
> At the moment the driver sets the power state of all the PDs it creates
> to off, regardless of the actual HW state. This has two drawbacks:
>
> 1) The kernel cannot disable unused PDs automatically for power saving,
> as it thinks they are off already
>
> 2) A more specific case (but perhaps applicable to other scenarios
> also): bootloader enabled splash-screen cannot be kept on the screen.
>
> The issue in 2) is that the driver framework automatically enables the
> device's PD before calling probe() and disables it after the probe().
> This means that when the display subsystem (DSS) driver probes, but e.g.
> fails due to deferred probing, the DSS PD gets turned off and the driver
> cannot do anything to affect that.
>
> Solving the 2) requires more changes to actually keep the PD on during
> the boot, but a prerequisite for it is to have the correct power state
> for the PD.
>
> The downside with this patch is that it takes time to call the 'is_on'
> op, and we need to call it for each PD. In my tests with AM62 SK, using
> defconfig, I see an increase from ~3.5ms to ~7ms. However, the added
> feature is valuable, so in my opinion it's worth it.
>
> The performance could probably be improved with a new firmware API which
> returns the power states of all the PDs.
Agreed. I think we have to pay this performance price for correctness,
and we can optimizie it later with improvements to the SCI firmware and
a new API.
> There's also a related HW issue at play here: if the DSS IP is enabled
> and active, and its PD is turned off without first disabling the DSS
> display outputs, the DSS IP will hang and causes the kernel to halt if
> and when the DSS driver accesses the DSS registers the next time.
Ouch.
> With the current upstream kernel, with this patch applied, this means
> that if the bootloader enables the display, and the DSS driver is
> compiled as a module, the kernel will at some point disable unused PDs,
> including the DSS PD. When the DSS module is later loaded, it will hang
> the kernel.
>
> The same issue is already there, even without this patch, as the DSS
> driver may hit deferred probing, which causes the PD to be turned off,
> and leading to kernel halt when the DSS driver is probed again. This
> issue has been made quite rare with some arrangements in the DSS
> driver's probe, but it's still there.
>
> So, because of the DSS hang issues, I think this patch is still an RFC.
Like you said, I think that DSS hang is an issue independently of this
patch, so it shouldn't hold this up IMO.
> Hopefully we can sort out all the issues, but this patch (or similar)
> will be part of the solution so I'd like to get some acks/nacks/comments
> for this. Also, this change might have side effects to other devices
> too, if the drivers expect the PD to be on, so testing is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
We already discussed this a bit off-list, but for the record, I agree
with the approach.
I also tested it on k3-am62a7-sk where I've been doing the other TI SCI
pmdomain work and everything still working fine.
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 6:41 Tomi Valkeinen
2024-10-22 11:18 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-10-30 20:04 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2024-10-31 7:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2024-10-31 10:25 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-11-01 6:46 ` Tomi Valkeinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7hmsilqrw3.fsf@baylibre.com \
--to=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=devarsht@ti.com \
--cc=kristo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=sebin.francis@ti.com \
--cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=vishalm@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®