From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.114 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794006644; b=zWIfQQer0PVF9rno1c74yzYpt1JwVLuItMTfnF6TzzE+Zgbt90xZZHqYnrCGy++Bl23b KN+7p1zTMK6bSl3wZt/TBkjs+ZGRDQ++KRdxlr+xkXvUng1F/iPnQV7MuI1qWmQvDzhJW FAvYoq0QjkHWMDDXBoutv+EbTPF89Cay+46CWCyAe6IzwNOI7Q5t7/IxKlh6Cb/h2Mg4o plLioDty/b65v8du2KrHdUaUMwCIh+LagpYAtzWbuPj0lriYD4T+v2osNpZrBIt7o+LDF G06nDcJWjSVY6IDY68nu3Ssc+DAYkJxa4qrkXLx3BcACV37OK2Tsp5N62tRsa3iDwUA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794006644; h=DMARC-Filter:X-Envelope-To:DKIM-Signature:X-Envelope-To:Received: X-Mizu-Trace-ID:X-Migadu-Flow:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:User-Agent:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=SSu8sahHYtJP4tYEpVQa1z5i0RcdS7+U4e1oKrlexBE=; b=bwdvrahkle/yfm+hzKCkCnS6g5UhNCKroI1gtMU3MKaTnFuoq7ziJYz+2H1IiMhX1B6V 2h9q4LtbIFP/jwWdHoSHGPYBWM0NgihYnz8YYUAehHxP0J11l1BgZbE95hYPcOXLbLnRs 74wQbsRdMjU1/SSwu77QKuJwyqM3i7TGX/msdD2xLc0RTEybz74bWXQiIyYrO8k2vxB3g o1fysE5LrnPUm/j88g8WxHJZM5vH6OvfOd62aj8x3EUE5REymnquvVlppmN2KgUxqAjiZ 4qtWzosxj/waQqSwkxvQd8WsCgIccJuPFWb2zJOrRKMmMUOtyZtW14sacMscTzdGMYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=QVdBHXCf; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=95.215.58.114 Received: from mta1.migadu.com (out-114.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D1B606A32E for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 23:10:42 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 97D1B606A32E Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=key1 header.b=QVdBHXCf X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=bSp589ynlUSbkHZ/Pc8oj+44xLBN6TotbLXU3BpwP8Q=; c=simple/simple; d=linux.dev; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=key1; t=1794006640; v=1; x=1794611440; b=QVdBHXCf+YgkLKYumhrLD6fpuUKcp+E/ZAqbFq9mwZooLmomr5cTdrc4rP9finr0QLFyh2ne CHFzaErK1kkzmQMX9iLCJOvg8dXjH5A+LgjuIlEZCaje1eD93ZQkyCrW/+1Fk1R7XSi5/A6sWYc mOtLmfjd1H+usMO9Ytx58ofw= X-Envelope-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: by mta10.migadu.com with ESMTPS id f5adb69807cbc1e0; Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:10:40 +0000 X-Mizu-Trace-ID: f5adb69807cbc1e0 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT From: Roman Gushchin To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org Cc: alex.aring@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] 6lowpan: fix netdev_priv() type confusion in lowpan_event() In-Reply-To: <179400615048.488859.9102835578031186781@kernel.org> (netdev-bot's message of "Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:02:30 +0000") References: <20261106225930.1379968-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev> <179400615048.488859.9102835578031186781@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.15; emacs 30.2 Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 23:10:33 +0000 Message-ID: <7ia4fqxd8sk6.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com> X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org writes: > Hi! > > This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its > commit messages seem to be missing some information: > > - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical > (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include > the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages. > > Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead, > reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers > can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for > other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages > then. > > The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think > that is the case please reply and explain. I've a reproducer which I don't want to post publicly but can share privately.