From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from out-172.mta1.migadu.com (out-172.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.172])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31F6347531
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Tue,  3 Mar 2026 21:12:31 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1772572353; cv=none; b=WflG4//mkD622hCpZNChuJuDSsm8Ca9UgojKtLvV0OZQD6qEr4K+hqCUcOKvf6RH2dCM6w4qgkIPrv5Q4I2xaUEKXVLv/VeIGwctj6jjqMeYBa23SyPUyP5FiUVibLvF9xNeVzQ2UCDbSYwG86ryBdofd992IvEqWo088NvL56c=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1772572353; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=J8f/rq0JhKVWLGrnHUIGFAM5wHzDzd/4yc+djUCeWPk=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IlXsscwJvX57HJd4j/loIHthf2ZvbXV2CNf1tCUkaGQtfqs0/i7sduZUcLo4yHh9QZzwarClzzzkPf6WlQROiIcM5jYuvmk7GgKiyoeDBFq+pbUZ7WcvbQ91HuyR+b9+Yk1fznF/lFdiZ3rOy9weTXkVG6soS/Wb8IG4u6gveTc=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=fMZKh+zX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.172
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="fMZKh+zX"
X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers.
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1;
	t=1772572340;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=J8f/rq0JhKVWLGrnHUIGFAM5wHzDzd/4yc+djUCeWPk=;
	b=fMZKh+zXIRa4g+vPYHT+JmDcAci63QcbjFjDp/Q90FjR5PZwCYwKI/kRoLm5RySjpdPeiS
	GV8Qd0rm1ZEqEklz/ok5TYdBNwk0TYREAqhEdvg/DFEAN17Jv3JF3O6PTbFkJjyaWH6Lau
	s0OkucNUKrjGor9LcxS2kFFn3OnpMk4=
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,  Hao Li <hao.li@linux.dev>,
  Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,  Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
  Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,  Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
  linux-mm@kvack.org,  cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5]: memcg: obj stock and slab stat caching cleanups
In-Reply-To: <20260302195305.620713-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org> (Johannes Weiner's
	message of "Mon, 2 Mar 2026 14:50:13 -0500")
References: <20260302195305.620713-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2026 21:11:49 +0000
Message-ID: <7ia4pl5kpqi2.fsf@castle.c.googlers.com>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT

Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> writes:

> This is a follow-up to `[PATCH] memcg: fix slab accounting in
> refill_obj_stock() trylock path`. The way the slab stat cache and the
> objcg charge cache interact appears a bit too fragile. This series
> factors those paths apart as much as practical.

Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
for the series.

My ai review bot is also entirely happy with it.

Thanks!