From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:32:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:30:57 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:59872 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 13 Jan 2001 13:25:28 -0500 Date: 13 Jan 2001 16:07:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de Message-ID: <7tn2wlMmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: ipppd == pppd? (was: Re: New features in Linux 2.4 - Wonderful Wor...) X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh5 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org jpranevich@lycos.com (Joe Pranevich) wrote on 06.01.01 in : > much of the code, including a long awaited combination of the PPP > layers from the ISDN layer and the serial device PPP layer, such as I've heard about that before, but I can find no hint about that in Documentation/. The separate ipppd is still mentioned there. Plus, looking at the ISDN PPP sources also gives no hint. What's up? MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/