From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:55:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:55:03 -0500 Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.82]:8210 "EHLO mailout05.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Jan 2001 14:54:50 -0500 Date: 20 Jan 2001 16:56:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <7uDh9dHmw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: Is sendfile all that sexy? (fwd)]] X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh5 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: <3A660746.543226B@cup.hp.com> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dean-list-linux-kernel@arctic.org (dean gaudet) wrote on 18.01.01 in : > i'm pretty sure the actual use of pipelining is pretty disappointing. > the work i did in apache preceded the widespread use of HTTP/1.1 and we What widespread use of HTTP/1.1? I justtried the following excercise: Request a nonexistant page with HTTP/1.1 syntax. a. Directly from Apache: I get a nice chunked HTTP/1.1 answer. b. Via Squid: I get a plain HTTP/1.0 answer. As long as not even Squid talks 1.1, how can we expect browsers to do it? WebMUX? In a thousand years perhaps. MfG Kai - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/