From: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Vivian Wang <uwu@dram.page>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] riscv: bitops: Convert to use_alternative_likely
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 23:36:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <800585ca-29ff-40ef-bddd-8cc14806dbb1@iscas.ac.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aKXj_zTwvk0SwUpV@yury>
On 8/20/25 23:04, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:44:49PM +0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
>> Use use_alternative_likely() to check for RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, replacing
>> the use of asm goto with ALTERNATIVE.
>>
>> The "likely" variant is used to match the behavior of the original
>> implementation using ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", ...).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn>
>> ---
>> arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h | 112 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> index d59310f74c2ba70caeb7b9b0e9221882117583f5..0257d547a96293909d90b017c8a48b508d0fd642 100644
>> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/bitops.h
>> @@ -47,20 +47,17 @@
>>
>> static __always_inline unsigned long variable__ffs(unsigned long word)
>> {
>> - asm goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[legacy]", "nop", 0,
>> - RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
>> - : : : : legacy);
>> -
>> - asm volatile (".option push\n"
>> - ".option arch,+zbb\n"
>> - "ctz %0, %1\n"
>> - ".option pop\n"
>> - : "=r" (word) : "r" (word) :);
>> -
>> - return word;
>> -
>> -legacy:
>> - return generic___ffs(word);
>> + if (use_alternative_likely(0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB)) {
> I don't think that 'likely' is used properly here. The likely/unlikely
> wording has a meaning of a hint to the compiler:
>
> if (unlikely(WARN_ON(cond))
> goto err;
>
> In your case, it's just meaningless, because whatever is 'likely' for
> one CPU, will be always 'unlikely' for another.
As mentioned in the reply for patch 1, I do believe that unfortunately
we currently have no way of leaving the decision up to the compiler, so
we have to pick one. The situation is similar to
static_branch_{likely,unlikely}.
So I have preserved the original choice made here: The original asm goto
uses the "likely" pattern, so I kept it as "likely".
>> + asm volatile (".option push\n"
>> + ".option arch,+zbb\n"
>> + "ctz %0, %1\n"
>> + ".option pop\n"
>> + : "=r" (word) : "r" (word) :);
>> +
>> + return word;
>> + } else {
>> + return generic___ffs(word);
>> + }
>> }
> This tabs wipe most of the history. Can you reorganize your patch
> such that it preserves as much history as you can?
>
> if (use_alternative_unlikely(...))
> return generic___ffs();
>
> asm volatile (".option push\n"
> ".option arch,+zbb\n"
> "ctz %0, %1\n"
> ".option pop\n"
> : "=r" (word) : "r" (word) :);
>
> return word;
>
> And so on.
Thanks for the tip, I'll give it a go at minimizing the diff for v2.
Vivian "dramforever" Wang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-20 13:44 [PATCH 0/6] riscv: Add helpers use_alternative_{likely,unlikely} Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] riscv: Introduce use_alternative_{likely,unlikely} Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 14:56 ` Yury Norov
2025-08-20 15:25 ` Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 15:43 ` Yury Norov
2025-08-20 16:41 ` Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] riscv: pgtable: Convert to use_alternative_unlikely Vivian Wang
2025-10-02 16:29 ` ChaosEsque Team
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] riscv: checksum: Convert to use_alternative_likely Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] riscv: hweight: " Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] riscv: bitops: " Vivian Wang
2025-08-20 15:04 ` Yury Norov
2025-08-20 15:36 ` Vivian Wang [this message]
2025-08-20 13:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] riscv: cmpxchg: " Vivian Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=800585ca-29ff-40ef-bddd-8cc14806dbb1@iscas.ac.cn \
--to=wangruikang@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=uwu@dram.page \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®