From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>,
tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
muchun.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: introduce non-blocking cpuset.mems setting option
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 09:34:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8029d719-9dc2-4c7d-af71-4f6ae99fe256@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520031552.1931598-1-hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
On 5/19/25 11:15 PM, Zhongkun He wrote:
> Setting the cpuset.mems in cgroup v2 can trigger memory
> migrate in cpuset. This behavior is fine for newly created
> cgroups but it can cause issues for the existing cgroups.
> In our scenario, modifying the cpuset.mems setting during
> peak times frequently leads to noticeable service latency
> or stuttering.
>
> It is important to have a consistent set of behavior for
> both cpus and memory. But it does cause issues at times,
> so we would hope to have a flexible option.
>
> This idea is from the non-blocking limit setting option in
> memory control.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506232833.3109790-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 7 +++++++
> kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 1a16ce68a4d7..d9e8e2a770af 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -2408,6 +2408,13 @@ Cpuset Interface Files
> a need to change "cpuset.mems" with active tasks, it shouldn't
> be done frequently.
>
> + If cpuset.mems is opened with O_NONBLOCK then the migration is
> + bypassed. This is useful for admin processes that need to adjust
> + the cpuset.mems dynamically without blocking. However, there is
> + a risk that previously allocated pages are not within the new
> + cpuset.mems range, which may be altered by move_pages syscall or
> + numa_balance.
> +
> cpuset.mems.effective
> A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
> cpuset-enabled cgroups.
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 24b70ea3e6ce..2a0867e0c6d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3208,7 +3208,18 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
> retval = update_exclusive_cpumask(cs, trialcs, buf);
> break;
> case FILE_MEMLIST:
> + bool skip_migrate_once = false;
> +
> + if ((of->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
> + is_memory_migrate(cs) &&
> + !cpuset_update_flag(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, cs, 0))
> + skip_migrate_once = true;
> +
> retval = update_nodemask(cs, trialcs, buf);
> +
> + /* Restore the migrate flag */
> + if (skip_migrate_once)
> + cpuset_update_flag(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, cs, 1);
> break;
> default:
> retval = -EINVAL;
I would prefer to temporarily make is_memory_migrate() helper return
false by also checking an internal variable, for example, instead of
messing with the cpuset flags.
Cheers,
Longman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-20 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-20 3:15 Zhongkun He
2025-05-20 13:13 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-20 13:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-20 13:34 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-05-21 2:35 ` [External] " Zhongkun He
2025-05-21 17:14 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-22 3:37 ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-22 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-23 15:35 ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-23 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-24 1:10 ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-24 1:14 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-24 2:09 ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-27 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-17 12:40 ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-18 2:46 ` Zhongkun He
2025-06-18 9:04 ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-19 3:49 ` Zhongkun He
2025-06-19 12:10 ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-24 8:11 ` Zhongkun He
2025-07-01 8:16 ` Michal Koutný
2025-05-21 3:45 Zhongkun He
2025-05-21 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8029d719-9dc2-4c7d-af71-4f6ae99fe256@redhat.com \
--to=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®