mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>,
	tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	muchun.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: introduce non-blocking cpuset.mems setting option
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 09:34:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8029d719-9dc2-4c7d-af71-4f6ae99fe256@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250520031552.1931598-1-hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>

On 5/19/25 11:15 PM, Zhongkun He wrote:
> Setting the cpuset.mems in cgroup v2 can trigger memory
> migrate in cpuset. This behavior is fine for newly created
> cgroups but it can cause issues for the existing cgroups.
> In our scenario, modifying the cpuset.mems setting during
> peak times frequently leads to noticeable service latency
> or stuttering.
>
> It is important to have a consistent set of behavior for
> both cpus and memory. But it does cause issues at times,
> so we would hope to have a flexible option.
>
> This idea is from the non-blocking limit setting option in
> memory control.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250506232833.3109790-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>
> ---
>   Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst |  7 +++++++
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c                  | 11 +++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index 1a16ce68a4d7..d9e8e2a770af 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -2408,6 +2408,13 @@ Cpuset Interface Files
>   	a need to change "cpuset.mems" with active tasks, it shouldn't
>   	be done frequently.
>   
> +	If cpuset.mems is opened with O_NONBLOCK then the migration is
> +	bypassed. This is useful for admin processes that need to adjust
> +	the cpuset.mems dynamically without blocking. However, there is
> +	a risk that previously allocated pages are not within the new
> +	cpuset.mems range, which may be altered by move_pages syscall or
> +	numa_balance.
> +
>     cpuset.mems.effective
>   	A read-only multiple values file which exists on all
>   	cpuset-enabled cgroups.
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 24b70ea3e6ce..2a0867e0c6d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -3208,7 +3208,18 @@ ssize_t cpuset_write_resmask(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>   		retval = update_exclusive_cpumask(cs, trialcs, buf);
>   		break;
>   	case FILE_MEMLIST:
> +		bool skip_migrate_once = false;
> +
> +		if ((of->file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) &&
> +			is_memory_migrate(cs) &&
> +			!cpuset_update_flag(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, cs, 0))
> +			skip_migrate_once = true;
> +
>   		retval = update_nodemask(cs, trialcs, buf);
> +
> +		/* Restore the migrate flag */
> +		if (skip_migrate_once)
> +			cpuset_update_flag(CS_MEMORY_MIGRATE, cs, 1);
>   		break;
>   	default:
>   		retval = -EINVAL;

I would prefer to temporarily make is_memory_migrate() helper return 
false by also checking an internal variable, for example, instead of 
messing with the cpuset flags.

Cheers,
Longman


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-20  3:15 Zhongkun He
2025-05-20 13:13 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-20 13:25 ` kernel test robot
2025-05-20 13:34 ` Waiman Long [this message]
2025-05-21  2:35   ` [External] " Zhongkun He
2025-05-21 17:14     ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-22  3:37       ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-22 19:03         ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-23 15:35           ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-23 16:51             ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-24  1:10               ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-24  1:14                 ` Tejun Heo
2025-05-24  2:09                   ` Zhongkun He
2025-05-27 19:04                     ` Tejun Heo
2025-06-17 12:40                 ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-18  2:46                   ` Zhongkun He
2025-06-18  9:04                     ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-19  3:49                       ` Zhongkun He
2025-06-19 12:10                         ` Michal Koutný
2025-06-24  8:11                           ` Zhongkun He
2025-07-01  8:16                             ` Michal Koutný
2025-05-21  3:45 Zhongkun He
2025-05-21 17:15 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8029d719-9dc2-4c7d-af71-4f6ae99fe256@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®