mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Peter Teoh" <htmldeveloper@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: htmldeveloper@gmail.com, "Kernel Newbies" <kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org>
Subject: RFC: Self-snapshotting in Linux
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:44:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <804dabb00804160144j25584229t6673bc182fa13b3@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Sorry if this is a a crazy idea.....just be forewarned....

First, I would like to make a reference to VMWare's snapshot (name not
important, emphasize the idea) feature - hopefully u are familiar with
it.   This is a feature whereby u can freeze the entire OS (kernel +
userspace application running) and then later reload itself next time,
continuing where it left off, without reboot from ground zero.

Next, can I ask, is such a feature useful in Linux?   Ie, able to
restart the kernel + userspace application from where u left off, the
last time round.    Not JUST the normal suspend/resume feature, but
more important able to CHOOSE among the different available images for
u to resume on.   Eg, u want to freeze the current 2.6.25-rc6 kernel,
save it, and then restore back the 2.6.23-rc5 image, work on it, save
it, and then restore the previous image again.   All done without
virtualization as in the VMWare sense - which really is CPU intensive
and slow things  down a lot.   Now we can directly execute each OS
kernel image on the CPU, and since saving and restoring is quite fast
(eg, zipping up the entire physical memory before saving into
permanent storage) - I supposed this will be much faster than the
normal initialization/fsck work done normally....or did I missed out
anything?

Essentially, to reiterate the key idea:   able to snapshot the current
kernel+userspace permanent.....restore from another snapshot....and
then switch back again if needed etc.....will the implementation be
difficult...if not impossible????

-- 
Regards,
Peter Teoh

             reply	other threads:[~2008-04-16  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-16  8:44 Peter Teoh [this message]
2008-04-16  8:49 ` eric miao
2008-04-16  9:49 ` Ben Nizette
2008-04-16 10:33 ` Scott Lovenberg
2008-04-16 11:14 ` Pavel Machek
     [not found]   ` <804dabb00804160821n4872c65fh44f2c07ead67fc49@mail.gmail.com>
2008-04-17  9:33     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-16 18:31 ` Greg Freemyer
     [not found] <ajbvb-3Ur-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <ajcri-65w-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-04-16 10:27   ` Alan Jenkins
2008-04-16 11:12     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-16 13:50       ` Alan Jenkins
2008-04-17  9:32         ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-19 16:42           ` Alan Jenkins
2008-04-17  0:55     ` Nigel Cunningham
2008-04-17  7:48       ` Alan Jenkins
     [not found] ` <ajd42-7Gt-49@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-04-16 11:02   ` Alan Jenkins
2008-04-16 15:06     ` Peter Teoh
2008-04-16 16:21       ` Disconnect
2008-04-16 19:50       ` Vivek Goyal
     [not found]         ` <48065C64.7010808@gmail.com>
2008-04-16 20:10           ` Scott Lovenberg
2008-04-16 20:25           ` Vivek Goyal
2008-04-17  2:09             ` Scott Lovenberg
2008-04-17  6:23           ` Peter Teoh
2008-04-17  8:43             ` Alan Jenkins
2008-04-17 16:01               ` Scott Lovenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=804dabb00804160144j25584229t6673bc182fa13b3@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=htmldeveloper@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelnewbies@nl.linux.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®