From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667CEC433EF for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2022 03:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230499AbiCEDdu (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:33:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229486AbiCEDdt (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:33:49 -0500 Received: from wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wnew1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.26]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F3B1DB3C6; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 19:32:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFE32B00158; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:32:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Mar 2022 22:32:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=mJWJFr2xwIdcBLgWF leFF/ItCGiD5KO4oeAEsg0YmsE=; b=D7dROpaZ9IbFQXnayqKtFMyokt2JpYSXI Qx18D70ZW82wYhb+b/ovkqX1k86TG//9znkFpTfqH4waMn2MPBNhFIDYa4hQUdav cZXuGuHA/HT/+t9QCCsJZjE4EyP4y2QZxpUqgly1NAfZeL/db/lpqThv3n6mBnj3 14haI1vN8PtMIHYtINe6C4B9sxakA5n+XtDx0kD1ETXTRfQ5b/0EQuK78ISraSHQ TKGGASOEEB9Yk3OBwRpaDoDAPN1lwKx69dTTGc4ZtB9sLQP8V51PCwqY44fo4pYm sfhqI7j8i/BPexSZu65cLnFe3VMZMUmkQNvn5MbbTyj16Ubv+tyEg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddtledgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffujgfkfhggtgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhephfhinhhnucfv hhgrihhnuceofhhthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepffduhfegfedvieetudfgleeugeehkeekfeevfffhieevteelvdfhtdevffet uedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepfh hthhgrihhnsehlihhnuhigqdhmieekkhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 22:32:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2022 14:32:53 +1100 (AEDT) From: Finn Thain To: Joe Perches cc: Miguel Ojeda , Tom Rix , Konrad Wilhelm Kleine , Bart Van Assche , kashyap.desai@broadcom.com, sumit.saxena@broadcom.com, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, Nathan Chancellor , Nick Desaulniers , megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com, scsi , linux-kernel , llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid In-Reply-To: <451bb2c394b05928c815f1eb349a1281a687a608.camel@perches.com> Message-ID: <80717e6-16ac-56b2-bf12-683d44f4743d@linux-m68k.org> References: <20220127151945.1244439-1-trix@redhat.com> <0adde369-3fd7-3608-594c-d199cce3c936@redhat.com> <46441b86-1d19-5eb4-0013-db1c63a9b0a5@redhat.com> <8dd05afd-0bb9-c91b-6393-aff69f1363e1@redhat.com> <233660d0-1dee-7d80-1581-2e6845bf7689@linux-m68k.org> <95f5be1d-f5f3-478-5ccb-76556a41de78@linux-m68k.org> <7368bc3ea6dece01004c3e0c194abb0d26d4932b.camel@perches.com> <9dc86e74-7741-bb8e-bbad-ae96cebaaebc@redhat.com> <451bb2c394b05928c815f1eb349a1281a687a608.camel@perches.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 4 Mar 2022, Joe Perches wrote: > > Is that statement really disputable? > If there was such a thing as an indisputable statement, a set of universally accepted style rules would soon follow, I suspect. ... > > There is no "one true editor". > There will not be "one true source code formatter" either. > It only has to be sufficiently good that it produces a consensus.