mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas@pgaddict.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo affected by 20d74bf29c
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 04:36:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80b21fe4-ee8b-314c-ee3e-c09386bf368d@pgaddict.com> (raw)

Hi,

While investigating a strange OOM issue on the 3.18.x branch (which 
turned out to be already fixed by 52c84a95), I've noticed a strange 
difference in Dirty/Writeback fields in /proc/meminfo depending on 
kernel version. I'm wondering whether this is expected ...

I've bisected the change to 20d74bf29c, added in 3.18.22 (upstream 
commit 4f258a46):

     sd: Fix maximum I/O size for BLOCK_PC requests

With /etc/sysctl.conf containing

     vm.dirty_background_bytes = 67108864
     vm.dirty_bytes = 1073741824

a simple "dd" example writing 10GB file

     dd if=/dev/zero of=ssd.test.file bs=1M count=10240

results in about this on 3.18.21:

     Dirty:            740856 kB
     Writeback:         12400 kB

but on 3.18.22:

     Dirty:             49244 kB
     Writeback:        656396 kB

I.e. it seems to revert the relationship. I haven't identified any 
performance impact, and apparently for random writes the behavior did 
not change at all (or at least I haven't managed to reproduce it).

But it's unclear to me why setting a maximum I/O size should affect 
this, and perhaps it has impact that I don't see.

regards
Tomas

             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-01  2:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-01  2:36 Tomas Vondra [this message]
2016-08-04 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-06 22:15   ` Tomas Vondra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80b21fe4-ee8b-314c-ee3e-c09386bf368d@pgaddict.com \
    --to=tomas@pgaddict.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®