From: YangYang <yang.yang@vivo.com>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dm: support retrieving struct dm_target from struct dm_dev
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:55:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80ddcd90-2e1c-4fbf-a45a-b1b5ff4d60fb@vivo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZkTXzG1yrPmW64Z6@redhat.com>
On 2024/5/15 23:42, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:04:42PM +0800, Yang Yang wrote:
>> Add a list to the struct dm_dev structure to store the associated
>> targets, while also allowing differentiation between different target
>> types.
>
> I still think this is more complex than it needs to be. If devices that
> support flush_pass_around can guarantee that:
>
> 1. They will send a flush bio to all of their table devices
> 2. They are fine with another target sending the flush bio to their
> table devices
>
> Then I don't see why we need the table devices to keep track of all the
> different target types that are using them. Am I missing something here?
I attempted to enhance this solution to support additional target types,
such as those with num_flush_bios greater than 1.
> If we don't need to worry about sending a flush bio to a target of each
> type that is using a table device, then all we need to do is call
> __send_empty_flush_bios() for enough targets to cover all the table
> devices. This seems a lot easier to track. We just need another flag in
> dm_target, something like sends_pass_around_flush.
>
> When a target calls dm_get_device(), if it adds a new table device to
> t->devices, then it's the first target in this table to use that device.
> If flush_pass_around is set for this target, then it also sets
> sends_pass_around_flush. In __send_empty_flush() if the table has
> flush_pass_around set, when you iterate through the devices, you only
> call __send_empty_flush_bios() for the ones with sends_pass_around_flush
> set.
>
> Or am I overlooking something?
If I understand correctly, you are suggesting to iterate through all the
targets, handling those with sends_pass_around_flush set, and skipping
those where sends_pass_around_flush is not set. I believe this approach
may result in some CPU wastage.
for i in {0..1023}; do
echo $((8000*$i)) 8000 linear /dev/sda2 $((16384*$i))
done | sudo dmsetup create example
In this specific scenario, a single iteration of the loop is all that
is needed.
>
> -Ben
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/device-mapper.h | 3 +++
>> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> index bd68af10afed..f6554590b7af 100644
>> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
>> @@ -741,6 +741,8 @@ int dm_table_add_target(struct dm_table *t, const char *type,
>> if (ti->flush_pass_around == 0)
>> t->flush_pass_around = 0;
>>
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ti->list);
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
>> bad:
>> @@ -2134,6 +2136,25 @@ void dm_table_postsuspend_targets(struct dm_table *t)
>> suspend_targets(t, POSTSUSPEND);
>> }
>>
>> +static int dm_link_dev_to_target(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
>> + sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct list_head *targets = &dev->targets;
>> + struct dm_target *pti;
>> +
>> + if (!list_empty(targets)) {
>> + list_for_each_entry(pti, targets, list) {
>> + if (pti->type == ti->type)
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (list_empty(&ti->list))
>> + list_add_tail(&ti->list, targets);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> int dm_table_resume_targets(struct dm_table *t)
>> {
>> unsigned int i;
>> @@ -2162,6 +2183,21 @@ int dm_table_resume_targets(struct dm_table *t)
>> ti->type->resume(ti);
>> }
>>
>> + if (t->flush_pass_around) {
>> + struct list_head *devices = &t->devices;
>> + struct dm_dev_internal *dd;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry(dd, devices, list)
>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dd->dm_dev->targets);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < t->num_targets; i++) {
>> + struct dm_target *ti = dm_table_get_target(t, i);
>> +
>> + if (ti->type->iterate_devices)
>> + ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, dm_link_dev_to_target, NULL);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/device-mapper.h b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
>> index 0893ff8c01b6..19e03f9b2589 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/device-mapper.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/device-mapper.h
>> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ struct dm_dev {
>> struct dax_device *dax_dev;
>> blk_mode_t mode;
>> char name[16];
>> + struct list_head targets;
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -298,6 +299,8 @@ struct dm_target {
>> struct dm_table *table;
>> struct target_type *type;
>>
>> + struct list_head list;
>> +
>> /* target limits */
>> sector_t begin;
>> sector_t len;
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-16 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-14 9:04 [PATCH 0/5] dm: empty flush optimization Yang Yang
2024-05-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 1/5] dm: introduce flush_pass_around flag Yang Yang
2024-05-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 2/5] dm: add __send_empty_flush_bios() helper Yang Yang
2024-05-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: support retrieving struct dm_target from struct dm_dev Yang Yang
2024-05-15 15:42 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2024-05-15 15:53 ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-16 20:49 ` [PATCH] dm: optimize flushes Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-17 8:55 ` YangYang
2024-05-22 16:10 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-22 21:05 ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 17:46 ` [PATCH v2] " Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 18:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2024-05-28 11:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2024-05-23 22:17 ` Eric Wheeler
2024-05-15 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/5] dm: support retrieving struct dm_target from struct dm_dev Benjamin Marzinski
2024-05-16 2:12 ` YangYang
2024-05-16 16:39 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2024-05-16 1:55 ` YangYang [this message]
2024-05-16 15:29 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2024-05-17 7:48 ` YangYang
2024-05-17 14:33 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2024-05-20 3:12 ` YangYang
2024-05-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 4/5] dm: Avoid sending redundant empty flush bios to the same block device Yang Yang
2024-05-14 9:04 ` [PATCH 5/5] dm linear: enable flush optimization function Yang Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80ddcd90-2e1c-4fbf-a45a-b1b5ff4d60fb@vivo.com \
--to=yang.yang@vivo.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®