From: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, <wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com>,
<yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip/gic-v4: fix occasional VLPI drop
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 09:32:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <80e52297-b2b3-ef90-4626-be3819afbf92@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548337028-21801-1-git-send-email-guoheyi@huawei.com>
Hi Marc,
Any comments?
Thanks,
Heyi
On 2019/1/24 21:37, Heyi Guo wrote:
> 1. In current implementation, every VLPI will temporarily be mapped to
> the first CPU in system (normally CPU0) and then moved to the real
> scheduled CPU later.
>
> 2. So there is a time window and a VLPI may be sent to CPU0 instead of
> the real scheduled vCPU, in a multi-CPU virtual machine.
>
> 3. However, CPU0 may have not been scheduled as a virtual CPU after
> system boots up, so the value of its GICR_VPROPBASER is unknown at
> that moment.
>
> 4. If the INTID of VLPI is larger than 2^(GICR_VPROPBASER.IDbits+1),
> while IDbits is also in unknown state, GIC will behave as if the VLPI
> is out of range and simply drop it, which results in interrupt missing
> in Guest.
>
> As no code will clear GICR_VPROPBASER at runtime, we can safely
> initialize the IDbits field at boot time for each CPU to get rid of
> this issue.
>
> We also clear Valid bit of GICR_VPENDBASER in case any ancient
> programming gets left in and causes memory corrupting. A new function
> its_clear_vpend_valid() is added to reuse the code in
> its_vpe_deschedule().
>
> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v2:
> - Also wait GICR_VPENDBASER.Dirty bit to be 0 in initialization [Marc]
> - Add a new function to reuse the code in its_vpe_deschedule() [Marc]
>
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> index 3365d44..531e945 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
> @@ -2060,6 +2060,29 @@ static int __init allocate_lpi_tables(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u64 its_clear_vpend_valid(void __iomem *vlpi_base)
> +{
> + u32 count = 1000000; /* 1s! */
> + bool clean;
> + u64 val;
> +
> + val = gits_read_vpendbaser(vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> + val &= ~GICR_VPENDBASER_Valid;
> + gits_write_vpendbaser(val, vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> +
> + do {
> + val = gits_read_vpendbaser(vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> + clean = !(val & GICR_VPENDBASER_Dirty);
> + if (!clean) {
> + count--;
> + cpu_relax();
> + udelay(1);
> + }
> + } while (!clean && count);
> +
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
> {
> void __iomem *rbase = gic_data_rdist_rd_base();
> @@ -2145,6 +2168,30 @@ static void its_cpu_init_lpis(void)
> val |= GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS;
> writel_relaxed(val, rbase + GICR_CTLR);
>
> + if (gic_rdists->has_vlpis) {
> + void __iomem *vlpi_base = gic_data_rdist_vlpi_base();
> +
> + /*
> + * It's possible for CPU to receive VLPIs before it is
> + * sheduled as a vPE, especially for the first CPU, and the
> + * VLPI with INTID larger than 2^(IDbits+1) will be considered
> + * as out of range and dropped by GIC.
> + * So we initialize IDbits to known value to avoid VLPI drop.
> + */
> + val = (LPI_NRBITS - 1) & GICR_VPROPBASER_IDBITS_MASK;
> + pr_debug("GICv4: CPU%d: Init IDbits to 0x%llx for GICR_VPROPBASER\n",
> + smp_processor_id(), val);
> + gits_write_vpropbaser(val, vlpi_base + GICR_VPROPBASER);
> +
> + /*
> + * Also clear Valid bit of GICR_VPENDBASER, in case some
> + * ancient programming gets left in and has possibility of
> + * corrupting memory.
> + */
> + val = its_clear_vpend_valid(vlpi_base);
> + WARN_ON(val & GICR_VPENDBASER_Dirty);
> + }
> +
> /* Make sure the GIC has seen the above */
> dsb(sy);
> out:
> @@ -2757,26 +2804,11 @@ static void its_vpe_schedule(struct its_vpe *vpe)
> static void its_vpe_deschedule(struct its_vpe *vpe)
> {
> void __iomem *vlpi_base = gic_data_rdist_vlpi_base();
> - u32 count = 1000000; /* 1s! */
> - bool clean;
> u64 val;
>
> - /* We're being scheduled out */
> - val = gits_read_vpendbaser(vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> - val &= ~GICR_VPENDBASER_Valid;
> - gits_write_vpendbaser(val, vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> -
> - do {
> - val = gits_read_vpendbaser(vlpi_base + GICR_VPENDBASER);
> - clean = !(val & GICR_VPENDBASER_Dirty);
> - if (!clean) {
> - count--;
> - cpu_relax();
> - udelay(1);
> - }
> - } while (!clean && count);
> + val = its_clear_vpend_valid(vlpi_base);
>
> - if (unlikely(!clean && !count)) {
> + if (unlikely(val & GICR_VPENDBASER_Dirty)) {
> pr_err_ratelimited("ITS virtual pending table not cleaning\n");
> vpe->idai = false;
> vpe->pending_last = true;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-29 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 13:37 Heyi Guo
2019-01-29 1:32 ` Heyi Guo [this message]
2019-01-29 8:12 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=80e52297-b2b3-ef90-4626-be3819afbf92@huawei.com \
--to=guoheyi@huawei.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=yangyingliang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®