Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] platform/x86/intel: punit_ipc: Drop wrong use of ACPI_PTR()

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 8/27/21 4:53 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ACPI_PTR() is more harmful than helpful. For example, in this case
> if CONFIG_ACPI=n, the ID table left unused which is not what we want.
> 
> Instead of adding ifdeffery here and there, drop ACPI_PTR()
> and unused acpi.h.
> 
> Fixes: fdca4f16f57d ("platform:x86: add Intel P-Unit mailbox IPC driver")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thank you for your patch, I've applied this patch to my review-hans 
branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/log/?h=review-hans

I will also add this to the fixes branch, so that it gets send out
to Linus in my next pull-request with fixes for 5.15.

Once I've run some tests on this branch the patches there will be
added to the platform-drivers-x86/for-next branch and eventually
will be included in the pdx86 pull-request to Linus for the next
merge-window.

Regards,

Hans

> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/punit_ipc.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/punit_ipc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/punit_ipc.c
> index f58b8543f6ac..66bb39fd0ef9 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/punit_ipc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/punit_ipc.c
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
>   * which provide mailbox interface for power management usage.
>   */
>  
> -#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/bitops.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/device.h>
> @@ -319,7 +318,7 @@ static struct platform_driver intel_punit_ipc_driver = {
>  	.remove = intel_punit_ipc_remove,
>  	.driver = {
>  		.name = "intel_punit_ipc",
> -		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(punit_ipc_acpi_ids),
> +		.acpi_match_table = punit_ipc_acpi_ids,
>  	},
>  };
>  
>