From: Ashutosh Naik <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: anandhkrishnan@yahoo.co.in, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rth@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Prevent overriding of Symbols in the Kernel, avoiding Undefined behaviour
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:56:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <81083a450512130626x417d86c9w31f300555c99fdb2@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1134424878.22036.13.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1243 bytes --]
On 12/13/05, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
>
> How about something like:
>
> const struct kernel_symbol *sym;
> unsigned int i;
> const unsigned long *crc;
> struct module *owner;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&modlist_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < mod->num_syms; i++)
> if (__find_symbol(mod->syms[i].name, &owner, &crc, 1))
> goto dup;
> for (i = 0; i < num->num_gpl_syms; i++)
> if (__find_symbol(mod->gpl_syms[i].name,&owner,&crc,1))
> goto dup;
> spin_unlock_irq(&modlist_lock);
> return 0;
> dup:
> printk("%s: exports duplicate symbol (owned by %s)\n",
> mod->name, module_name(owner));
> return -ENOEXEC;
> }
Have tried that in the attached patch. However, mod->syms[i].name
would be valid only after a long relocation for loop has run through.
While this adds a wee bit extra overhead, that overhead is only in the
case where the module does actually export a Duplicate Symbol.
This its a question, whether we do the search before relocation ( A
little messier ) or after ( More straight forward)
Regards
Ashutosh
[-- Attachment #2: mod13Decpatch.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1701 bytes --]
--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.15-rc5-vanilla/kernel/module.c 2005-12-07 19:32:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.15-rc5/kernel/module.c 2005-12-13 19:44:43.000000000 +0530
@@ -1204,6 +1204,42 @@ void *__symbol_get(const char *symbol)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__symbol_get);
+/*
+ * Ensure that an exported symbol [global namespace] does not already exist
+ * in the Kernel or in some other modules exported symbol table.
+ */
+static int verify_export_symbols(struct module *mod)
+{
+ const char *name=0;
+ unsigned long i, ret = 0;
+ struct module *owner;
+ const unsigned long *crc;
+
+ spin_lock_irq(&modlist_lock);
+ for (i = 0; i < mod->num_syms; i++)
+ if (unlikely(__find_symbol(mod->syms[i].name, &owner, &crc,1))) {
+ name = mod->syms[i].name;
+ ret = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto dup;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < mod->num_gpl_syms; i++)
+ if (unlikely(__find_symbol(mod->gpl_syms[i].name, &owner, &crc,1))) {
+ name = mod->gpl_syms[i].name;
+ ret = -ENOEXEC;
+ goto dup;
+ }
+
+dup:
+ spin_unlock_irq(&modlist_lock);
+
+ if (ret)
+ printk("%s: exports duplicate symbol %s (owned by %s)\n",
+ mod->name, name, module_name(owner));
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* Change all symbols so that sh_value encodes the pointer directly. */
static int simplify_symbols(Elf_Shdr *sechdrs,
unsigned int symindex,
@@ -1767,6 +1804,12 @@ static struct module *load_module(void _
goto cleanup;
}
+ /* Find duplicate symbols */
+ err = verify_export_symbols(mod);
+
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+
/* Set up and sort exception table */
mod->num_exentries = sechdrs[exindex].sh_size / sizeof(*mod->extable);
mod->extable = extable = (void *)sechdrs[exindex].sh_addr;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-12 12:39 Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 12:44 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 22:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-13 8:23 ` Anand H. Krishnan
2005-12-12 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-12 19:27 ` Richard Henderson
2005-12-12 20:20 ` Greg KH
2005-12-12 20:30 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-12-12 22:48 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-13 8:03 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-13 14:32 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-12 22:01 ` Rusty Russell
2005-12-13 14:26 ` Ashutosh Naik [this message]
2005-12-13 15:28 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-13 16:49 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Jesper Juhl
2005-12-14 2:03 ` Rusty Russell
2005-12-14 4:10 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 5:02 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-15 4:40 ` Andrew Morton
2005-12-15 5:15 ` Rusty Russell
2005-12-15 5:45 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 5:46 ` Ashutosh Naik
2005-12-14 23:02 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=81083a450512130626x417d86c9w31f300555c99fdb2@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ashutosh.naik@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=anandhkrishnan@yahoo.co.in \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rth@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®