mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ashutosh Naik" <ashutosh.naik@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Christie" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	open-iscsi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Kernel Crash when using the open-iscsi initiator on 2.6.25.6
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:05:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81083a450806251035k285e4e3dga052f041c9e2d94d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48627851.9010804@cs.wisc.edu>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu> wrote:

>>  connection5:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, last rx 4309652882,
>> last ping 4309657882, now 4309662882
>
>
> However, once it happens we should not report it again like is done here.
> There is something weird there. Do you have the iscsid output? Between these
> two reports of pings timing out is there any messages from iscsid about
> reconnecting?

iscsid tried to reconnect but the target died, I think.

>>  connection5:0: detected conn error (1011)
>>  connection5:0: detected conn error (1011)
>>  session5: host reset succeeded
>
>
> And we should not get here. The iscsi driver's scsi command timeout handler
> should prevent the command from firing the scsi eh, because in this case we
> think it is a transport problem.
>
> What version of the iscsi tools are you using? Are they from a distro or
> open-iscsi.org?
>
> Are you running with the iscsi kernel modules from 2.6.25.6, or are you
> using the iscsi modules from the open-iscsi.org website that come with the
> tarball?
>
> Is the kernel a unmodified 2.6.25.6 or does it have some distro patches or
> patches that you have created?

It was an unmodififed 2.6.25.6 kernel, and open-iscsi version 2.0-869.2

>> INFO: task fdisk:5226 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
>
> I think you get this message and what follows, is a result of the above
> problem. While the iscsi initiator is trying to reconnect, IO is queued by
> the scsi layer so fdisk is going to be waiting around until we recover or
> give up.

Yep, but is there any way to close gracefully and avoid the kernel dump?

Thanks
Ashutosh

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-25 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-25  5:36 Ashutosh Naik
2008-06-25 16:54 ` Mike Christie
2008-06-25 17:35   ` Ashutosh Naik [this message]
2008-06-25 17:47     ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81083a450806251035k285e4e3dga052f041c9e2d94d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=ashutosh.naik@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=open-iscsi@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®