mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	"lukas@wunner.de" <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: "alex.williamson@redhat.com" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"christian.koenig@amd.com" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"logang@deltatee.com" <logang@deltatee.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE features via sysfs
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 04:52:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <810ec30e-4732-f156-a236-ec23191ad7f3@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230817235810.596458-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com>

On 8/17/23 16:58, Alistair Francis wrote:
> The PCIe 6 specification added support for the Data Object Exchange (DOE).
> When DOE is supported the Discovery Data Object Protocol must be
> implemented. The protocol allows a requester to obtain information about
> the other DOE features supported by the device.
>
> The kernel is already querying the DOE features supported and cacheing
> the values. This patch exposes the values via sysfs. This will allow
> userspace to determine which DOE features are supported by the PCIe
> device.
>
> By exposing the information to userspace tools like lspci can relay the
> information to users. By listing all of the supported features we can
> allow userspace to parse and support the list, which might include
> vendor specific features as well as yet to be supported features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
> ---
> v6:
>   - Use "feature" instead of protocol
>   - Don't use any devm_* functions
>   - Add two more patches to the series
> v5:
>   - Return the file name as the file contents
>   - Code cleanups and simplifications
> v4:
>   - Fixup typos in the documentation
>   - Make it clear that the file names contain the information
>   - Small code cleanups
>   - Remove most #ifdefs
>   - Remove extra NULL assignment
> v3:
>   - Expose each DOE feature as a separate file
> v2:
>   - Add documentation
>   - Code cleanups
>
> This patch will create a doe_features directory for all
> PCIe devices without the next two patches
>
>   Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci |  11 +++
>   drivers/pci/doe.c                       | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c                 |  10 +++
>   drivers/pci/pci.h                       |   3 +
>   include/linux/pci-doe.h                 |   1 +
>   5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> index ecf47559f495..199ee5d27d9d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
> @@ -500,3 +500,14 @@ Description:
>   		console drivers from the device.  Raw users of pci-sysfs
>   		resourceN attributes must be terminated prior to resizing.
>   		Success of the resizing operation is not guaranteed.
> +
> +What:		/sys/bus/pci/devices/.../doe_features
> +Date:		August 2023
> +Contact:	Linux PCI developers <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
> +Description:
> +		This directory contains a list of the supported
> +		Data Object Exchange (DOE) features. The feature values are in the

overly long line above ...

> +		file name. The contents of each file are the same as the name.
> +		The value comes from the device and specifies the vendor and
> +		data object type supported. The lower byte is the data object
> +		type and the next two bytes are the vendor ID.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/doe.c b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> index 1b97a5ab71a9..316aac60ccd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/doe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/doe.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ struct pci_doe_mb {
>   	wait_queue_head_t wq;
>   	struct workqueue_struct *work_queue;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	struct device_attribute *sysfs_attrs;

above naked declaration without CONFIG_SYSFS seems really odd
especially following code is under CONFIG_SYSFS, unless it is
accessed outside of CONFIG_SYSFS (which I don't think it is
a right interface) then ignore this comment ..

>   };
>   
>   struct pci_doe_protocol {
> @@ -92,6 +94,116 @@ struct pci_doe_task {
>   	struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
>   };
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> +static umode_t pci_doe_sysfs_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> +					     struct attribute *a, int n)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
> +	unsigned long total_features = 0;
> +	struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> +	unsigned long index, j;
> +	void *entry;
> +
> +	xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb) {
> +		xa_for_each(&doe_mb->prots, j, entry)
> +			total_features++;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (total_features == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return a->mode;
> +}
> +

this removes the need for extra variable to avoids unnecessary
loop iterations unless there is bug in this suggestion, why not following ?

static umode_t pci_doe_sysfs_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
					     struct attribute *a, int n)
{
	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(kobj_to_dev(kobj));
	struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
	unsigned long index, j;
	void *entry;

	xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb) {
		xa_for_each(&doe_mb->prots, j, entry)
			return a->mode;
	}

	return 0;
}


> +static struct attribute *pci_dev_doe_feature_attrs[] = {
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
> +const struct attribute_group pci_dev_doe_feature_group = {
> +	.name	= "doe_features",
> +	.attrs	= pci_dev_doe_feature_attrs,
> +	.is_visible = pci_doe_sysfs_attr_is_visible,
> +};
> +
> +static ssize_t pci_doe_sysfs_feature_show(struct device *dev,
> +					  struct device_attribute *attr,
> +					  char *buf)
> +{
> +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", attr->attr.name);
> +}
> +
> +static int pci_doe_sysfs_feature_supports(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +					  struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_attribute *attrs;
> +	unsigned long num_features = 0;
> +	unsigned long vid, type;
> +	unsigned long i;
> +	void *entry;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	xa_for_each(&doe_mb->prots, i, entry)
> +		num_features++;
> +
> +	attrs = kcalloc(num_features, sizeof(*attrs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!attrs)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	doe_mb->sysfs_attrs = attrs;
> +	xa_for_each(&doe_mb->prots, i, entry) {
> +		sysfs_attr_init(&attrs[i].attr);
> +		vid = xa_to_value(entry) >> 8;
> +		type = xa_to_value(entry) & 0xFF;
> +		attrs[i].attr.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL,
> +					       "0x%04lX:%02lX", vid, type);
> +		if (!attrs[i].attr.name) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
> +
> +		attrs[i].attr.mode = 0444;
> +		attrs[i].show = pci_doe_sysfs_feature_show;
> +
> +		ret = sysfs_add_file_to_group(&dev->kobj, &attrs[i].attr,
> +					      pci_dev_doe_feature_group.name);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto fail;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +fail:
> +	doe_mb->sysfs_attrs = NULL;
> +	xa_for_each(&doe_mb->prots, i, entry) {
> +		if (attrs[i].show)
> +			sysfs_remove_file_from_group(&dev->kobj, &attrs[i].attr,
> +						     pci_dev_doe_feature_group.name);
> +		kfree(attrs[i].attr.name);
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(attrs);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int doe_sysfs_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb;
> +	unsigned long index;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	xa_for_each(&pdev->doe_mbs, index, doe_mb) {
> +		ret = pci_doe_sysfs_feature_supports(pdev, doe_mb);
> +
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   static int pci_doe_wait(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, unsigned long timeout)
>   {
>   	if (wait_event_timeout(doe_mb->wq,
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index ab32a91f287b..3f5104cf78b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>   #include <linux/sched.h>
>   #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
>   #include <linux/stat.h>
>   #include <linux/export.h>
>   #include <linux/topology.h>
> @@ -1226,6 +1227,12 @@ static int pci_create_resource_files(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>   	int i;
>   	int retval;
>   
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_DOE)) {
> +		retval = doe_sysfs_init(pdev);
> +		if (retval)
> +			return retval;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* Expose the PCI resources from this device as files */
>   	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>   
> @@ -1651,6 +1658,9 @@ static const struct attribute_group *pci_dev_attr_groups[] = {
>   #endif
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCIEASPM
>   	&aspm_ctrl_attr_group,
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_DOE
> +	&pci_dev_doe_feature_group,
>   #endif
>   	NULL,
>   };
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index a4c397434057..139d37a0d4cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -180,6 +180,9 @@ extern const struct attribute_group *pci_dev_groups[];
>   extern const struct attribute_group *pcibus_groups[];
>   extern const struct device_type pci_dev_type;
>   extern const struct attribute_group *pci_bus_groups[];
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> +extern const struct attribute_group pci_dev_doe_feature_group;
> +#endif
>   
>   extern unsigned long pci_hotplug_io_size;
>   extern unsigned long pci_hotplug_mmio_size;
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-doe.h b/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> index 1f14aed4354b..4cc13d9ccb50 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-doe.h
> @@ -22,4 +22,5 @@ int pci_doe(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb, u16 vendor, u8 type,
>   	    const void *request, size_t request_sz,
>   	    void *response, size_t response_sz);
>   
> +int doe_sysfs_init(struct pci_dev *pci_dev);
>   #endif


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-18  4:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-17 23:58 Alistair Francis
2023-08-17 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] sysfs: Add a attr_is_visible function to attribute_group Alistair Francis
2023-08-18  0:35   ` Damien Le Moal
2023-08-19 10:57   ` Greg KH
2023-08-22 20:20     ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-23  7:02       ` Greg KH
2023-08-28  5:05         ` Alistair Francis
2023-08-31  8:31           ` Greg KH
2023-08-31 14:36             ` Greg KH
2023-09-01 21:00               ` Greg KH
2023-10-05 13:05                 ` Greg KH
2023-10-11  5:10                   ` Alistair Francis
2023-10-11  6:44                     ` Greg KH
2023-10-12  4:31                       ` Alistair Francis
2024-01-23  4:04                         ` Alistair Francis
2024-01-23 12:25                           ` Greg KH
2024-01-24 20:31                             ` Dan Williams
2024-01-26 18:58                               ` Dan Williams
2024-01-26 19:07                                 ` Greg KH
2024-01-26 20:08                                   ` Dan Williams
2024-01-27  3:00                                     ` Dan Williams
2024-01-28  0:21                                       ` Greg KH
2024-01-28  1:42                                         ` Dan Williams
2024-01-28 14:53                                           ` Greg KH
2023-08-17 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI/DOE: Only expose the sysfs attribute group if DOE is supported Alistair Francis
2023-08-18  4:52 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2023-08-18  5:48 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI/DOE: Expose the DOE features via sysfs kernel test robot
2023-08-21 21:07 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=810ec30e-4732-f156-a236-ec23191ad7f3@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
    --cc=alistair23@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=logang@deltatee.com \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®