From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev,
Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com, Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com,
venkataprasad.potturu@amd.com, Syed.SabaKareem@amd.com,
Richard.Gong@amd.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: amd: fix SDW command timeout return value handling
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 12:48:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <813fafd9-64fd-4f0c-9aa6-37fba57a1f4a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260910190240.1604447-2-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
On 9/10/26 14:00, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
> amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp() returned u64 but was returning -ETIMEDOUT
> (a negative int) on readl_poll_timeout() failures, which silently
> widens to a large u64 value.
>
> Change the return type to int and pass the raw u64 response through an
> out-parameter. Timeout is detected directly from readl_poll_timeout()
> return value.
>
> Update all callers: amd_program_scp_addr(), _amd_sdw_xfer_msg(),
> amd_sdw_read_and_process_ping_status(), and amd_sdw_read_ping_status()
> to check the return value and handle timeout explicitly. In
> amd_sdw_read_and_process_ping_status(), the mutex unlock is also moved
> to after amd_sdw_process_ping_status() so the lock is held across the
> full status processing step.
>
> Fixes: d8f48fbdfd9a ("soundwire: amd: Add support for AMD Manager driver")
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> index a3316efdf8ac..fa3f4e797edd 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -250,10 +250,9 @@ static void amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(u32 *lower_word, u32 *upper_word, struct sdw_m
> *lower_word = lower_data;
> }
>
> -static u64 amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lower_data,
> - u32 upper_data)
> +static int amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lower_data,
> + u32 upper_data, u64 *response)
> {
> - u64 resp;
> u32 lower_resp, upper_resp;
> u32 sts;
> int ret;
> @@ -291,9 +290,8 @@ static u64 amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lo
> amd_manager->instance);
> return ret;
> }
> - resp = upper_resp;
> - resp = (resp << 32) | lower_resp;
> - return resp;
> + *response = ((u64)upper_resp << 32) | lower_resp;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static enum sdw_command_response
> @@ -309,19 +307,22 @@ amd_program_scp_addr(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, struct sdw_msg *msg)
> scp_msg.buf = &msg->addr_page1;
> scp_msg.flags = SDW_MSG_FLAG_WRITE;
> amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(&lower_data, &upper_data, &scp_msg, 0);
> - response_buf[0] = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data);
> + if (amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data, &response_buf[0])) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev,
> + "SCP_addrpage command timeout for Slave %d\n", msg->dev_num);
> + return SDW_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> + }
> scp_msg.addr = SDW_SCP_ADDRPAGE2;
> scp_msg.buf = &msg->addr_page2;
> amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(&lower_data, &upper_data, &scp_msg, 0);
> - response_buf[1] = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data);
> + if (amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data, &response_buf[1])) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev,
> + "SCP_addrpage command timeout for Slave %d\n", msg->dev_num);
> + return SDW_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> + }
>
> for (index = 0; index < 2; index++) {
> - if (response_buf[index] == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> - dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev,
> - "SCP_addrpage command timeout for Slave %d\n",
> - msg->dev_num);
> - return SDW_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> - } else if (!(response_buf[index] & AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_ACK)) {
> + if (!(response_buf[index] & AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_ACK)) {
> if (response_buf[index] & AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_NACK) {
> dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev,
> "SCP_addrpage NACKed for Slave %d\n",
> @@ -366,11 +367,7 @@ static enum sdw_command_response amd_sdw_fill_msg_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *a
> if (msg->flags == SDW_MSG_FLAG_READ)
> msg->buf[offset] = FIELD_GET(AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_RDATA, response);
> } else {
> - if (response == -ETIMEDOUT) {
> - dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev, "command timeout for Slave %d\n",
> - msg->dev_num);
> - return SDW_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> - } else if (response & AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_NACK) {
> + if (response & AMD_SDW_MCP_RESP_NACK) {
> dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev,
> "command response NACK received for Slave %d\n",
> msg->dev_num);
> @@ -390,7 +387,11 @@ static unsigned int _amd_sdw_xfer_msg(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, struc
> u32 upper_data = 0, lower_data = 0;
>
> amd_sdw_ctl_word_prep(&lower_data, &upper_data, msg, cmd_offset);
> - response = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data);
> + if (amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, lower_data, upper_data, &response)) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev, "command timeout for Slave %d\n",
> + msg->dev_num);
> + return SDW_CMD_TIMEOUT;
> + }
> return amd_sdw_fill_msg_resp(amd_manager, msg, response, cmd_offset);
> }
>
> @@ -446,9 +447,14 @@ static void amd_sdw_read_and_process_ping_status(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_man
> u64 response;
>
> mutex_lock(&amd_manager->bus.msg_lock);
guard(mutex) might work better here so you don't need to cover every
exit path with a mutex_unlock() manually.
> - response = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, 0, 0);
> - mutex_unlock(&amd_manager->bus.msg_lock);
> + if (amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, 0, 0, &response)) {
> + mutex_unlock(&amd_manager->bus.msg_lock);
> + dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x ping status timeout\n",
> + amd_manager->instance);
> + return;
> + }
> amd_sdw_process_ping_status(response, amd_manager);
> + mutex_unlock(&amd_manager->bus.msg_lock);
> }
>
> static u32 amd_sdw_read_ping_status(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> @@ -457,7 +463,11 @@ static u32 amd_sdw_read_ping_status(struct sdw_bus *bus)
> u64 response;
> u32 slave_stat;
>
> - response = amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, 0, 0);
> + if (amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(amd_manager, 0, 0, &response)) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x ping status timeout\n",
> + amd_manager->instance);
> + return 0;
> + }
> /* slave status from ping response */
> slave_stat = FIELD_GET(AMD_SDW_MCP_SLAVE_STAT_0_3, response);
> slave_stat |= FIELD_GET(AMD_SDW_MCP_SLAVE_STAT_4_11, response) << 8;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-10 19:00 [PATCH 0/8] soundwire: amd: SoundWire manager driver bug fixes Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 1/8] soundwire: amd: fix SDW command timeout return value handling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-11 17:48 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-09-12 8:49 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 2/8] soundwire: amd: cache ping slave status to avoid spurious disconnect on timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-13 19:59 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-14 5:31 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 3/8] soundwire: amd: fix work drain ordering and pm_runtime guard in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-13 20:05 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-14 6:07 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-14 17:30 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-15 4:42 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-09-15 11:24 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 4/8] soundwire: amd: fix ctx leak when sdw_amd_startup() fails Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 5/8] soundwire: amd: propagate amd_init_sdw_manager() error on resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 6/8] soundwire: amd: drop amd_deinit_sdw_manager() in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 7/8] soundwire: amd: replace >= ACP70 with explicit switch/case in PM paths Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-10 19:00 ` [PATCH 8/8] soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops Vijendar Mukunda
2026-09-11 17:52 ` [PATCH 0/8] soundwire: amd: SoundWire manager driver bug fixes Mario Limonciello
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=813fafd9-64fd-4f0c-9aa6-37fba57a1f4a@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@amd.com \
--cc=Richard.Gong@amd.com \
--cc=Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com \
--cc=Syed.SabaKareem@amd.com \
--cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=venkataprasad.potturu@amd.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®